We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Croydon Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Vanuku Nationalists Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2227
Description[?]:
| A Bill aimed to aid Police/ Emergency Services around the Country |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's stance on illegal aliens.
Old value:: The government does not actively search for illegal aliens, but expels them from the country when discovered.
Current: The government actively searches houses for illegal aliens and puts them in integration centers when discovered.
Proposed: The government actively searches houses for illegal aliens and expels them from the country.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Malpractice suits.
Old value:: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Current: Malpractice suits may be brought against doctors.
Proposed: Malpractice regulations are left to the locality of the practicing doctor.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:39:59, May 13, 2006 CET | From | Liberal Democrat Party | To | Debating the Croydon Act |
| Message | Cannot support this act, the first article is a waste of police numbers, most "illegal" citizens are working active productive lives without causing any grief to the nation. Police numbers could be better used elsewheres |
| Date | 10:14:12, May 13, 2006 CET | From | Social Devolutionist | To | Debating the Croydon Act |
| Message | 1and three I would have difficulty supporting. They are obviously consistent with each other, a greater role for the police being backed up by civilian involvement of the police, but I do not feel that either the greater role or the involvement of the army in civilian policing (other than in times of national emergency), is justified. No 2 is a sensible and practical initiative, to get such matters out of the federal court system. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 95 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 137 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 328 |
| Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law. |
| Random quote: "The spread of evil is the symptom of a vacuum. Whenever evil wins, it is only by default: by the moral failure of those who evade the fact that there can be no compromise on basic principles." - Ayn Rand |