We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: OOC/RP : Better RP
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party (Hardliners)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 5035
Description[?]:
| The Propositions are 1) The creation of a upper house : The Senate, if we stay in a Monarchy : that will represent the interest of the Aristocracy and of the Duchies, if we proclamed a Republic, that will represent the interest of the States (Duchies renamed). Their powers can be limited but they have the last word on many laws. 2) The Two-Party System this is a pretty radical proposal, but one which I think would enhance the roleplay experience and offer interesting opportunities: create a two-party system in Luthori. By this I mean that each player would RP as a faction of one of two parties. This has been explored before, such as with the LSP and the 49th-century Conservative Union of Luthori/Civic Alliance of Luthori coalitions. Outside Luthori there was an RPed two-party system in Baltusia for some time following the introduction of the nation’s current America-inspired setup. Per the rules this would not be compulsory to participate in, but people playing as their own parties would inevitably be doomed to third party status at best, providing an incentive to play within the proposed system. Government programmes would be more coherent, based on party manifestos rather than whatever promises are thrown together to form a cabinet. Party organisations would be used for intra-party discussions, with players deciding beforehand the composition of their governments and shadow cabinets. This micro-scale factional basis could also offer opportunities for RP around individual characters and their careers. I’m interested in hearing people’s thoughts |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:27:21, November 27, 2021 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the OOC/RP : Better RP |
| Message | 1. 'Last word on many laws' would be impossible to do. 2. I still support this, but think it would ideally have RP building up to it. Also the associated FPTP RP in the original proposal would be nice to do. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 20 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 280 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If your "Bills under debate" section is cluttered up with old bills created by inactive parties, report them for deletion on the Bill Clearouts Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "I'll see you in the Palace in Kivonia once we win this war... and I'm ecstatic to be the one to execute you. Sleep well." - Queen Annalise, former Telamonese monarch |