Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 02:24:06
Server time: 13:35:53, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Tayes3 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Democracy Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2069

Description[?]:

In search of greater representation in Likaton we propose this bill

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:39:30, June 18, 2005 CET
FromProletariat Revolution Party
ToDebating the Democracy Act
MessageThis didn't pass before. Drop it.

Date17:10:30, June 18, 2005 CET
Frommutt Party
ToDebating the Democracy Act
MessageNo.

Date19:22:04, June 18, 2005 CET
FromRepublican Party
ToDebating the Democracy Act
MessageIf there are more citizens within a region, it is only natural and right that they be given a larger amount of representation within the National Council.

I am in favor of this bill in its' current form and will vote in favor should it be brought to a vote.

Date19:54:43, June 18, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Democracy Act
MessageI am also in favour.

Date21:50:54, June 18, 2005 CET
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Democracy Act
MessageThis will lead to cities dominating the countryside. What about rural areas?

Date23:22:20, June 18, 2005 CET
Frommutt Party
ToDebating the Democracy Act
MessageAt the moment it is a true representation of what our citizens want.

Date23:33:02, June 18, 2005 CET
FromRight Wing Liberals Party
ToDebating the Democracy Act
MessageIll support

Date00:18:36, June 19, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Democracy Act
MessageIt is altogether fairer - more people, greater proportion of the opinion, greater proportion of the vote. we run more or less a proportional representation system as it is, so we may as well stick with that.

Date18:59:04, June 19, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Party
ToDebating the Democracy Act
MessageThe bill received overwhelming support and was held by just a few stubborn parties ...
thats why I brought it back to vote.

The current system allows disproportionate power to certain smaller communities. Lets have one person, one vote

Date23:40:12, June 19, 2005 CET
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Democracy Act
MessageUnder a one person, one vote system only larger communities will matter.

The current system is fair to ALL regions. It prevents regional power plays, and encourages the government to act on a truly national level.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 179

no
  

Total Seats: 21

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position.

Random quote: "Men are so simple and so much inclined to obey immediate needs that a deceiver will never lack victims for his deceptions." - Niccolo Machiavelli

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 81