Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5474
Next month in: 01:11:03
Server time: 14:48:56, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): albaniansunited | DanivonX | GLNBei | LC73DunMHP | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Increase Seats

Details

Submitted by[?]: Independent Combat Weapons Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2070

Description[?]:

The United Federation of Malivia is one of the only nations that still has 100 seats.We think it would make things more interesting if there were more seats.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:01:49, June 19, 2005 CET
FromLibCom Party
ToDebating the Increase Seats
MessageWe're in favour of increasing the number of seats. If we have to have representative democracy, then the more representation the better.

Date14:36:23, June 19, 2005 CET
FromIndependent Combat Weapons Party
ToDebating the Increase Seats
MessageI agree.Also if we need to we can increase the number even more at a later time.

Date03:40:45, June 20, 2005 CET
FromSocial Republican Party
ToDebating the Increase Seats
MessageI still want this.

Date11:06:53, June 20, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the Increase Seats
Messagewhy 175?

Date15:29:29, June 20, 2005 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Increase Seats
Messagewe are still against any increase in the seats.

Date16:42:03, June 20, 2005 CET
FromIndependent Combat Weapons Party
ToDebating the Increase Seats
MessageIs there anything wrong with 175?

Date17:19:48, June 20, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the Increase Seats
Messagenot really anything wrong, but we're just wondering what the rationale for it is. did you just pick that number or did you figure it based on some sort of calculation of the distribution of population?

Date17:55:34, June 20, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the Increase Seats
Messagealso we would not really support an increase in the number of seats for central government untill the population has reached 50 million people. we believe government should be as small as possible and that local government should play a stronger role.

Date06:32:59, June 21, 2005 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Increase Seats
MessageThe majority of the parties in the Assemby cannot be trusted with the governing of the people. We should not put our faith in the government but rather look toward the chuch for guidance. When more members of this body have accepted that they are just the terrestrial guides for the citizens we may be able to support such a measure until then the Assemby should be reduced.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 38

no
    

Total Seats: 55

abstain
     

Total Seats: 7


Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time.

Random quote: "When strangers start acting like neighbors, communities are reinvigorated." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67