We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: RP : Homeland Security Act Passed Without Diet Approval !
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party (Hardliners)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 5102
Description[?]:
Homeland Security Law Passed Without Diet Approval: Most politicians in the Imperial Diet believed that after the Homeland Security Act passed, which failed to pass the Diet, the government would have abandoned the hardline path to fight the Political Crisis, but this was not the case, this Thursday April 21, 5101, the Prime Minister, present at a session of Questions to the Prime Minister (PMQ), answered a question from a conservative deputy, who asked him "What is the government going to do after the Homeland Security Act failed to pass the Diet?" to which he replied "Well, the Government is very disappointed that the Vote was against them, but we took away something from this, it is that this Diet is full of Politicians who want to continue this Crisis, so we We have decided, that the Government, under Article 49.3 of the Constitution of the Holy Luthorian Empire, take charge of the HSA, without passing a vote of the Diet, thank you." The Government passed without the agreement of the Imperial Diet, the Homeland Security Act, and gave itself a more important place in the Domestic Policy. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:24:20, April 09, 2022 CET | From | Course of Freedom (Kellins faction) | To | Debating the RP : Homeland Security Act Passed Without Diet Approval ! |
Message | There is no article 49.3 of the Constitution. The Homeland Security Act cannot pass. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 99 | |||
no | Total Seats: 131 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 70 |
Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
Random quote: "Democrats always assure us that deterrence will work, but when the time comes to deter, they're against it. " - Ann Coulter |