Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5472
Next month in: 01:34:18
Server time: 06:25:41, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Television Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Green Manalishi Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2232

Description[?]:

In the interests of quality, informative and expressive programming, and against profiteering from cheap populism.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:57:38, May 22, 2006 CET
From Growth and Prosperity Party
ToDebating the National Television Bill
Message"In the interests of quality, informative and expressive programming, and against profiteering from cheap populism."

What about entertainment? Does the GMP seriously want to get rid of all "fun" on tv? The best tv is ALWAYS the "cheap populism" as you claim, because there is a legitimate demand for shows that are simply entertaining. The consequences of this bill are quite apparent:
1) No more "cheap populist" tv channels such as JBC, JNN, J-Fox, etc, all replaced by JBS and other non-profits
2) Ratings plunge, as Jelbanians realize their only options for entertainment are Jesame Street and Jova starring that really old, boring man Alan Jalda.
3) Panic ensues as a thriving black market develops for importing "cheap populist tv" from overseas
4) President Richard Milhaus Friedman is forced to "declare war on tv", sending millions of tv smugglers to jail
5) Black market tv becomes the hottest drugs in school, starting from pre-school children

More seriously though, what's wrong with the current option? While the GPP understands the GMP's faith in an active government, do you REALLY want to watch a tv show planned by politicians?

Date23:14:28, May 22, 2006 CET
From Green Manalishi Party
ToDebating the National Television Bill
Message1) We don't propose that politicians plan TV but that independent co-operatives do! this protects against political propaganda and indoctrination whilst allowing programming to be controlled from multiple viewpoints, as opposed to being controlled by the financial interests of one corporate bigwig.

2) We won't have to fight the black market because there will be no demand for one.

3) We are concerned by the fusion of entertainment and information in our society, we will not feed our citizens dumbed-down, apathy-inducing drivel.

4) "Le plaisir visuel ne suffit pas." (visual pleasure is insufficient) Jean-Luc Godard.

5) Private media/ media run on a hierarchical structure is the new "opium of the people".

Date01:44:41, May 23, 2006 CET
From Jelbék Zemojad Lofrkad Prta
ToDebating the National Television Bill
MessageThe DLP would like to clarify that it is, actually, "opiate of the people".

We see valid points from both sides. To the GPP, it is clear that the government would not be controlling television, nor would there necessarily be an end to good programming.

It is well known in the business of entertainment that it is not to find out what the audience wants and then produce it, but to tell the audience what it wants and produce it.

If this measure will put an end to reality television, we are in full support.

Date11:24:48, May 23, 2006 CET
From Green Manalishi Party
ToDebating the National Television Bill
Message"Religion is the opium of the people" (translated from the German "Die Religion ... ist das Opium des Volkes") is one of the most frequently quoted statements of Karl Marx, from the introduction of his 1843 work Contribution to Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_of_the_people

we'll call it an issue of translation.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 181

no
 

Total Seats: 160

abstain
     

Total Seats: 284


Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with.

Random quote: "All within the state; nothing outside the state; nothing against the state." - Benito Mussolini

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55