We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pro-Life Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Democracy
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2071
Description[?]:
| The Neoliberal Party believes that the highest value is Life, and thus we want to protect it. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Proposed: Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The right to euthanasia.
Old value:: Euthanasia is allowed with consent from the patient and the treating doctor.
Current: Euthanasia is allowed with consent from the patient and the treating doctor.
Proposed: Euthanasia is illegal and considered murder.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:31:30, June 20, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian Alcoholic Par-tay | To | Debating the Pro-Life Bill |
| Message | Nope. |
| Date | 20:08:30, June 20, 2005 CET | From |  RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Pro-Life Bill |
| Message | Against. |
| Date | 10:45:56, June 21, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Pro-Life Bill |
| Message | Against both. We would be willing to support abortions only being allowed in the first trimester except in medical emergencies as we feel 24 weeks is very late to perform abortions. We support euthanasia and are against its change. |
| Date | 18:15:38, June 22, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Pro-Life Bill |
| Message | For the first against the second. |
| Date | 01:04:05, June 23, 2005 CET | From | New Democracy | To | Debating the Pro-Life Bill |
| Message | We will then stand alone in the voting. |
| Date | 16:18:15, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Pro-Life Bill |
| Message | Feh, we'll go for and eat the hypocracy. Unborn children are more important to us. |
| Date | 17:44:59, June 23, 2005 CET | From | United Socialist Hellenic Front | To | Debating the Pro-Life Bill |
| Message | for |
| Date | 17:45:36, June 23, 2005 CET | From | United Socialist Hellenic Front | To | Debating the Pro-Life Bill |
| Message | I'm sure I put this through before and everyone was against... |
| Date | 01:55:49, June 24, 2005 CET | From | New Party | To | Debating the Pro-Life Bill |
| Message | Against. |
| Date | 00:44:01, June 25, 2005 CET | From | Postmodern Party | To | Debating the Pro-Life Bill |
| Message | The postmodern party believes in the right of deciding about your own life, and is also a party that resembles the quality of life. Euthanasia should be possible because of those two reasons. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 129 | |||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 370 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, it is the responsibility of players to ensure the candidate boxes on their Party Overview screens are filled in with appropriate names. If a player is allotted seats in a Cabinet bill and has not filled in names for the relevant candidate position, then the program will automatically fill in the positions with names which might not necessarily be appropriate for the Cultural Protocols. |
| Random quote: "You cannot open a book without learning something." - Confucius |