We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Retirement Age Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Corporatist Nationalist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2237
Description[?]:
| The CNP belives that the retirement age must be lessed by 5 years. we belive that 68 is too much and people wont enjoy their few live that they will has. Age 63 is far better then 68. We hope that all parties agree on this and treat our worker as human as possible. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The professional retirement age.
Old value:: 68
Current: 60
Proposed: 63
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:20:46, June 01, 2006 CET | From | Tee Party | To | Debating the Retirement Age Act |
| Message | The Tee party supports retirement at any age that the individual could afford to retire without government assistance. My assumption is that this is government paid retirement, so , the lowering of the age/increasing the tax burden on citizens would be unaccetpable. |
| Date | 01:31:02, June 02, 2006 CET | From | Corporatist Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Retirement Age Act |
| Message | We believe that after 46 years of work, workers shall retire and rest and having fun with his family. Nothing with this will affect any tax or any ammount of pention they paid. they will remain the same. |
| Date | 06:29:54, June 02, 2006 CET | From | Progressive Conservatives | To | Debating the Retirement Age Act |
| Message | Are you, then, proposing that this be a mandatory retirement age? If so, then that is even more unacceptable - we cannot force people to retire. If you're not talking about a mandatory retirement, well, people can already retire at any age they want. The only remaining way for a retirement legislation to have any real significant is if it modifies policy with regards to pension; however, you have stated that pensions and spending will not be affected. This legislation is, therefore, in short, useless. |
| Date | 10:50:30, June 02, 2006 CET | From | Corporatist Nationalist Party | To | Debating the Retirement Age Act |
| Message | We arent forcing people to retire. We are trying to make old workers to retire early . The current retirment age is too much. |
| Date | 19:34:32, June 02, 2006 CET | From | Progressive Conservatives | To | Debating the Retirement Age Act |
| Message | "We aren't forcing people to retire." "We are trying to make old workers to [sic] retire early." A little contradictory, no? In any case, see our above message. Clearly the Corporatist Nationalist Party does not even care about this issue enough to think it through or to pay attention to all the concerns raised. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 370 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 5 |
| Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position. |
| Random quote: "The empires of the future are the empires of the mind." - Winston Churchill |