We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Environmental Protection Act of 2236
Details
Submitted by[?]: Cruzada Tradicionalista Sekowana
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2250
Description[?]:
We like clean air and... you know, like, stuff... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Commercial fishing regulation.
Old value:: There are no limits on the amount of fish that may be caught.
Current: Commercial fishing is completely banned
Proposed: The government establishes fishing quotas.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning the use of pesticides.
Old value:: Farmers are required to list chemicals used on their crops.
Current: Local governments may choose to regulate pesticides certification programs.
Proposed: The government approves and regulates agricultural chemical use.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards smoking.
Old value:: Smoking is legal everywhere, at the discretion of the property owner. However, service/employer property owners that allow smoking must provide a separate non-smoking section.
Current: Smoking regulations are to be determined by local governments.
Proposed: Smoking is only allowed in private homes and clubs.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:30:53, June 02, 2006 CET | From | Drake Party | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act of 2236 |
Message | The Drake party has serious problems with 3,4, and 5. Maybe we could simplify the bill so a compromise could be made. |
Date | 05:50:35, June 03, 2006 CET | From | People's Liberation Army | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act of 2236 |
Message | We agree with the Drake Party. |
Date | 00:53:40, June 10, 2006 CET | From | Drake Party | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act of 2236 |
Message | We disagree with 3 but 1 & 2 are good. We are leaning toward suporting this bill. |
Date | 23:49:10, June 30, 2006 CET | From | The Worker's Communist Party Of Sekowo | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act of 2236 |
Message | the Communist Party Likes All of the Articles |
Date | 00:23:32, July 05, 2006 CET | From | Cruzada Tradicionalista Sekowana | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act of 2236 |
Message | Looking good. No scary fascist confiscatory stuff. Good. |
Date | 00:24:44, July 05, 2006 CET | From | Cruzada Tradicionalista Sekowana | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act of 2236 |
Message | Ha ha. This is like OURS. God, I need to stop smoking the kind weed. My memory is GONE... |
Date | 01:40:45, July 05, 2006 CET | From | People's Liberation Army | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act of 2236 |
Message | 2-1, we agree. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 416 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 134 |
Random fact: Party organizations are eligible for deletion if they are over 50 in-game years old, do not have at least 1 active member or are historically significant and possess historically significant information. |
Random quote: "If a female president can come here and be treated equally, why can't any other woman?" - Jewell C. Stillman, former Lourennais politician (on equal rights in Badara) |