Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 00:04:48
Server time: 19:55:11, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): ADM Drax | Caoimhean | SocDemDundorfian | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Reform of law regarding euthanasia

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2240

Description[?]:

Euthanasia is basically to legalize a murder on the reason it is for the best of the killed individual, we acknowledge this might be the case to some, but to allow this decision to be taken by the patient and the treating doctor, with no understanding of the law and biased and could have other personal reasons to agree.

It only seem right to have the decision taken by a third part, which ofcourse would be the court, the justice of our nation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:07:40, June 08, 2006 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Reform of law regarding euthanasia
MessageEuthanasia is basically to legalize a murder on the reason it is for the best of the killed individual, we acknowledge this might be the case to some, but to allow this decision to be taken by the patient and the treating doctor, with no understanding of the law and biased and could have other personal reasons to agree.

It only seem right to have the decision taken by a third part, which ofcourse would be the court, the justice of our nation.

Date02:19:34, June 09, 2006 CET
FromTelamon Patriots' Bloc
ToDebating the Reform of law regarding euthanasia
MessageThe MLP believes people have the right to do what they want with their life so long as it does not endanger others. This includes the right to end their life. This is a deeply personal decision that should only be made by the patient, not some judge after hearing 5 minute arguments. We vote no.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 202

no
  

Total Seats: 0

abstain
  

Total Seats: 29


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." - John Adams

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 48