We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Time Zone
Details
Submitted by[?]: Protectorate Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2244
Description[?]:
Itaki and Washibar go in AMT+1, the others stay in AMT http://www.takeforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=94536&mforum=particracy#94536 |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 07:18:56, June 09, 2006 CET | From | Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Time Zone |
Message | Currently the entire nation is in AMT. We suggest one of 4 options: 1) keep it that way 2) Itaki and Washibar go in AMT+1, the others stay in AMT 3) Itaki and Washibar go in AMT+1, Walkunia goes AMT+1/2, the others stay in AMT 4) the entire nation goes AMT +1/2 Opinions? |
Date | 02:16:14, June 11, 2006 CET | From | Malivia Democratic Party | To | Debating the Time Zone |
Message | The first 2 options would work. The last 2 wouldn't. When you have multiple timezones in close areas, it can make business more complicated and other things complicated. OOC: Take states like Indiana for example which are divided awkwardly. Anyways. Options 1 or 2 would be fine. Either would be fine. |
Date | 08:36:43, June 13, 2006 CET | From | Protectorate Party | To | Debating the Time Zone |
Message | What's wrong with #4? THe whole nation would be on the same time zone. I agree three should be removed. We lean toward 2 or 4. Other comments? |
Date | 23:23:36, June 13, 2006 CET | From | Malivia Democratic Party | To | Debating the Time Zone |
Message | With 4, you would have the same problem business wise again except this time with other nations. Just do option 2. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 81 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 220 |
Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map. |
Random quote: "When strangers start acting like neighbors, communities are reinvigorated." - Ralph Nader |