Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 00:00:30
Server time: 23:59:29, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): Aladas | Arusu-Gad | BMsellar | Caoimhean | reformist2024 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Library System

Details

Submitted by[?]: Protectorate Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2071

Description[?]:

As a way of providing a solid centralized manner and regulations for the distribution of reading materials and information sources we support a library system under the control of the national government.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:42:12, June 22, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the Library System
Messagesounds like a great idea. libraries are an important part of post graduate further education and must be funded consistently. of course we would also like to attach a resolution allowing for libraries to be co-sponsored by private companies on a contract basis.

studies have shown that private libraries are very succesfully managed.

Date17:07:13, June 22, 2005 CET
FromIndependent Combat Weapons Party
ToDebating the Library System
MessageWe will support this bill fully.

Date23:14:24, June 22, 2005 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Library System
MessageWe do not object to the funding being assisted by private corporations provided the governement controls the content.

Date01:45:11, June 23, 2005 CET
FromLibCom Party
ToDebating the Library System
MessagePrivate corporations will only contribute if they can use the libraries to promote their own interests. Private ownership could also pose problems for inter-library loans. Best keep them under the control of the government.

The content must be truly comprehensive, as specified in the proposal, and not subject to censorship by any parties. In fact, protection from any future censorship should be written into this bill.

Date04:24:20, June 23, 2005 CET
FromSocial and Labour Reform Party
ToDebating the Library System
MessageThis sounds like an excellent proposal, however we would object to private organisations being involved, as they would surely be only in it for their own gain.

Date04:35:49, June 23, 2005 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Library System
MessagePurposeful censorship is of course not to be permitted. Though of course it is the nature of libraries to be pruned and we cannot store everything every written.
Librarian's are well trained in these matters, and are the strongest defenders of such rights.

Yes, companies are looking for their own interest, yet at the same time these need not conflict with those of the library system.
for instance a coffee shop can open in the library to encourage people to come, a online book store can provide links to provide an option to by the book. A computer company or hosting service can donate machines/space for use hoping to boost sales. If done properly and carefully these can help fund the cost of a well equiped library.
Again these are issues librarians have been trained to handle and they are strong defenders of the free library.
And a library should be a site people want to go to, this at times or in some places may require a some commercialization to draw people in. A great library is useless if no one goes there.

Date11:47:45, June 23, 2005 CET
FromLibCom Party
ToDebating the Library System
MessageObviously we're not suggesting that each branch library should store everything ever written - their content will be at the discretion of the librarians, subject to public demand. We should, however, establish a central library that does store everything ever published in Malivia, and with the facilities to provide copies for any branch library on demand.

It may be acceptable to have companies provide certain services within or alongside libraries, but the libraries themselves should be maintained by government, and not contracted out.

Date20:34:17, June 23, 2005 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Library System
MessageAgree.

Date11:06:19, June 24, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the Library System
Message00c: true true, we agree with libcom, our only point in mentioning some sort of private assistance alongside is becuase in America the librarians union has put so many restrictions on the library system; making it only legal for librarians to do ex and y, which in the end means that many libraries are close 3 days out of the week. we want them to be open as much as possible.

Date01:52:40, June 25, 2005 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Library System
MessageHmmm...are we going to have to vote for a bill that sounds good but is quite possibly written witht he worst of intentions?


Date05:01:20, June 26, 2005 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Library System
MessageThose being?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
        

Total Seats: 95

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 5


    Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy".

    Random quote: "You can only progress when you think big, you can only move forward when you look further." - Arria Ivmarus, former Selucian politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 77