Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 01:04:28
Server time: 10:55:31, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hnp19 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Interrogation Methods

Details

Submitted by[?]: Protectorate Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2071

Description[?]:

Torture is an ugly word, we prefer to think that a police officer should be free to gain needed information.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:28:24, June 22, 2005 CET
FromSocial Republican Party
ToDebating the Interrogation Methods
MessageWe look forward to defeating you one the voting floor.

Date10:32:35, June 22, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the Interrogation Methods
MessageThe FRP cannot support torture.

Date10:36:03, June 22, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the Interrogation Methods
Messagetorture isn't always effective: remember, under torture someone will say anything to get them to stop talking.

Date19:04:02, June 22, 2005 CET
FromLibCom Party
ToDebating the Interrogation Methods
MessageIndeed. Torture works fairly well at getting your victim to tell you what they think you want to hear, but it's not much use when it comes to ascertaining the truth.

Not to mention the obvious ethical issues.

Date22:53:53, June 22, 2005 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Interrogation Methods
MessageAs we said torture can cover many different methods. We are not condoning bring back an iron maiden, but perhaps some very effective means to convince people to talk.
Many speak of the ethical aspects of this proposal, but how ethical is it to allow information to go ungathered leading to other lives lost.

Date02:53:41, June 24, 2005 CET
FromRadical Centrists
ToDebating the Interrogation Methods
MessageWe are very concerned at the new direction being taken by the PP.

ooc: I suppose someone had to play the right-wing nut! ;-)

Date04:08:10, June 24, 2005 CET
From Protectorate Party
ToDebating the Interrogation Methods
MessageIt is nice to here from the RC again we only hope that their members can see the Path that is opening in front of them.

Date11:07:26, June 24, 2005 CET
From Free Reform Coalition (FRP)
ToDebating the Interrogation Methods
Messagetry not to get bulldozed eh RC? also, good to see your back.

Date01:24:53, June 25, 2005 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Interrogation Methods
MessageWe're appalled at the suggestion. Appalled we say.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 16

no
        

Total Seats: 84

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved.

Random quote: "I'm the motherfucking Premier of Kalistan. It don't get more full time than that!" - Omar Al-Khali, former Kalistani politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 75