Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 03:09:40
Server time: 16:50:19, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): ADM Drax | burgerboys | hexaus18 | R Drax | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: ICU Manifesto, by the Idealist Caucus, in case of a snap election.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party (Hardliners)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 5273

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:39:14, March 18, 2023 CET
FromCourse of Freedom (Kellins faction)
ToDebating the ICU Manifesto, by the Idealist Caucus, in case of a snap election.
MessageDear fellow members of parliament,

I rise today to express my deep concerns about the proposals put forward by some of our colleagues. These proposals seek to roll back important policies that have benefited our society and our citizens. I want to focus on each proposal in turn and explain why they are misguided and harmful.

Firstly, the proposal to end government subsidies for contraceptives is an incredibly short-sighted policy. Contraceptives play a crucial role in ensuring that women have control over their bodies and can plan their families. By removing access to free or discounted contraceptives, we risk reversing the progress made in improving women's health and rights. This proposal would have a disproportionate impact on low-income women, who would be unable to afford the high cost of contraceptives, leading to more unwanted pregnancies and unsafe abortions.

Secondly, the proposal to ban Democratic Workers' Councils from running a business is an attack on the fundamental right to organize and collectively bargain. These councils play a vital role in promoting worker participation and democracy in the workplace. Banning them would only serve to entrench the power of the capitalist class and undermine workers' rights.

Thirdly, the proposal to end child benefit would be a devastating blow to low-income families, who rely on this support to provide for their children. Children are the future of our society, and we must do all we can to ensure that they have access to the resources and opportunities they need to thrive. This proposal is heartless and short-sighted, and it must be opposed.

Fourthly, the proposal to make all abortions illegal is a blatant attack on women's reproductive rights. Women must have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and health, free from interference from the state or religious institutions. Banning abortions would lead to a rise in unsafe, back-alley abortions and put the lives of women at risk.

Fifthly, the proposal to make healthcare entirely private would be disastrous for the most vulnerable members of our society. Healthcare is a fundamental human right, and it should not be treated as a commodity to be bought and sold. A private healthcare system would lead to a two-tiered system, where only the wealthy could afford access to quality care, leaving the rest of us to fend for ourselves.

Sixthly, the proposal to allow only male partners to initiate a divorce is a regressive and misogynistic policy. Women must have the right to leave an unhappy or abusive marriage and start a new life. Taking away this right would lead to more cases of domestic violence and make it harder for women to escape from abusive relationships.

Finally, the proposal to make euthanasia illegal is an attack on individual autonomy and dignity. Everyone should have the right to make decisions about their own life and death, free from the interference of the state or religious institutions. Banning euthanasia would only lead to more suffering and pain for those who are terminally ill or in unbearable pain.

In conclusion, I urge all members of this parliament to reject these proposals.

Gareth Holmes, MP.


subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 246

no
     

Total Seats: 314

abstain
  

Total Seats: 90


Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663

Random quote: "Up against the corporate government, voters find themselves asked to choose between look-alike candidates from two parties vying to see who takes the marching orders from their campaign paymasters and their future employers. The money of vested interest nullifies genuine voter choice and trust." - Ralph Nader

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72