We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Crossdressing compromise
Details
Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Luthori
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 5274
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government position in respect to crossdressing policy.
Old value:: Crossdressing is prohibited by the state.
Current: Local governments determine the legality of crossdressing.
Proposed: Local governments determine the legality of crossdressing.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:34:20, March 20, 2023 CET | From | Course of Freedom (Kellins faction) | To | Debating the Crossdressing compromise |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, I rise today to speak out against the proposed change to the government's position on crossdressing policy. As it stands, crossdressing is prohibited by the state, and this proposal seeks to devolve the decision-making power to local governments, allowing them to determine the legality of crossdressing. I strongly believe that this proposal is not only discriminatory but also a step backward in terms of human rights and equality. Crossdressing is a form of self-expression, and every individual has the right to express themselves freely, without fear of persecution or discrimination. It is a personal choice and should not be dictated by the government or local authorities. Moreover, this proposal ignores the fact that crossdressing has a long and rich history, from ancient cultures to modern-day fashion. It is not a new trend or a passing fad but a legitimate form of artistic expression and identity. By devolving the decision-making power to local governments, we risk creating a patchwork of different laws and regulations across the country, leading to confusion and inconsistency. It also creates the potential for discrimination against individuals based on where they live and the local government's attitudes towards crossdressing. In conclusion, Mr. Speaker, I urge all members of parliament to reject this proposal and instead work towards creating a society where individuals can express themselves freely, without fear of discrimination or persecution. Thank you. Edward Jagger, MP. |
| Date | 16:50:08, March 20, 2023 CET | From | Liberal Socialist Party 🌷 (LSP) | To | Debating the Crossdressing compromise |
| Message | Mr Speaker, I think that what my Right Honourable colleague is suggesting is that, while this bill is a step in the right direction, it does not go far enough, not that the LSP is happy with the current policy. Clarence Vaughn MP |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 193 | ||||||
| no |
Total Seats: 415 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 42 |
| Random fact: Make sure to check out Particracy's wiki. http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Main_Page |
| Random quote: "It is better to be feared than loved, if you cannot be both." - Niccolo Machiavelli |