We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Diritto di riunirsi
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partito Libertario
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2245
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Current: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Proposed: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:22:57, June 26, 2006 CET | From | Partito Laico Riformista | To | Debating the Diritto di riunirsi |
| Message | Non è meglio prevenire i disordini? |
| Date | 11:33:50, June 26, 2006 CET | From | Partito Libertario | To | Debating the Diritto di riunirsi |
| Message | Finchè non ci sono i disordini, questa rimane pura e semplice repressione. |
| Date | 11:53:15, June 26, 2006 CET | From | Partito Laico Riformista | To | Debating the Diritto di riunirsi |
| Message | Quindi se un gruppo di persone si raggruppa per assaltare una proprietà privata, possono essere dispersi solo dopo aver commesso il crimine? |
| Date | 13:54:54, June 26, 2006 CET | From | Partito Libertario | To | Debating the Diritto di riunirsi |
| Message | proprio così.non possiamo fare come minority report, dove uno viene messo in prigione prima che abbia fatto il reato(o solo perchè lo ha pensato), oppure, esempio più lampante, non possiamo assolutamente invadere uno stato in una guerra preventiva, solo perchè "riteniamo" che stia per dichiararci guerra o "supponiamo" che ospiti terroristi. |
| Date | 17:14:30, June 26, 2006 CET | From | Partito Laico Riformista | To | Debating the Diritto di riunirsi |
| Message | Si, ma qua si parla di reati comuni, mica di espressione. Se esistono delle prove che stia per avvenire un'azione crimnale, allora essa deve essere stroncata sul nascere. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 222 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 235 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 142 |
| Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI). |
| Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |