Bill: Protection of Strikers Act
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2246
|Employee's must be allowed to go on strike for their conditions without fear of being fired by ruthless companies. This act proposes to protect all workers from intimidation by their bosses.|
Proposal[?] to change Employer's rights in regards to firing striking workers.
Old value:: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Current: Employers can fire workers who are deemed to have gone on strike without reasonable reasons.
Proposed: Employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike.
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
|Date||01:03:41, June 27, 2006 CET||From||Maroon Party||To||Debating the Protection of Strikers Act|
|Message||When you strike, you are basically refusing to work. If you aren't going to work and live up to your end of the bargain, employers have every right not to pay you.|
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Total Seats: 78
Total Seats: 79
Total Seats: 42
|Random fact: Laws outlined in bill descriptions but not specified in game mechanic proposals are known as "role-play laws" or "RP laws" and are recognised under the rules as binding. Constitutional RP laws require a 2/3rds majority, just like game mechanic constitutional laws. Non-constitutional RP laws require a simple majority, just like non-constitutional game mechanic laws.|
|Random quote: "I swear to the Lord I still can't see Why Democracy means Everybody but me." - Langston Hughes, The Black Man Speaks|