Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 4532
Next month in: 01:03:45
Server time: 18:56:14, February 16, 2019 CET
Currently online (7): Applehead | BreakDownSoul | GrzBrz | Kaiser101 | Leo Basu | Moderation | TenPound | Record: 63 on 23:28:53, August 06, 2007 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Protection of Strikers Act


Submitted by[?]: Dorvish Popular Front

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2246


Employee's must be allowed to go on strike for their conditions without fear of being fired by ruthless companies. This act proposes to protect all workers from intimidation by their bosses.



These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:03:41, June 27, 2006 CET
FromMaroon Party
ToDebating the Protection of Strikers Act
MessageWhen you strike, you are basically refusing to work. If you aren't going to work and live up to your end of the bargain, employers have every right not to pay you.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe


Vote Seats

Total Seats: 78


Total Seats: 79


Total Seats: 42

Random fact: Laws outlined in bill descriptions but not specified in game mechanic proposals are known as "role-play laws" or "RP laws" and are recognised under the rules as binding. Constitutional RP laws require a 2/3rds majority, just like game mechanic constitutional laws. Non-constitutional RP laws require a simple majority, just like non-constitutional game mechanic laws.

Random quote: "I swear to the Lord I still can't see Why Democracy means Everybody but me." - Langston Hughes, The Black Man Speaks

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 42