We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Call for early elections, August 2070
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Centrist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.
Voting deadline: April 2071
Description[?]:
| We, the Likaton Future Party, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus. |
Proposals
Article 1
Arrange early elections as soon as this bill passes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:09:35, June 23, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 2070 |
| Message | Let's try this again. There are currently no bills being voted on to be derailed by it, so there won't be any bad effects of early elections. |
| Date | 05:12:33, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Proletariat Revolution Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 2070 |
| Message | Hypocrite! |
| Date | 05:17:34, June 23, 2005 CET | From | People's Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 2070 |
| Message | Let atleast one govt ride out it full term! We haven't a govt like that for 20 years! |
| Date | 09:20:47, June 23, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 2070 |
| Message | Parti Egalite et Liberte: That's a strange stance for the person who proposed it in the first place. People's Party: There's no harm in elections. Perhaps this is a sign that we need to shorten the term lengths. |
| Date | 10:48:15, June 23, 2005 CET | From | People's Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 2070 |
| Message | Possibly..but then we would have shorter debates.. |
| Date | 16:28:18, June 23, 2005 CET | From | Proletariat Revolution Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 2070 |
| Message | LFP - sure. It's also a strange stance for someone who voted against the previous one to propose one right away. |
| Date | 23:51:56, June 23, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 2070 |
| Message | PSD: As I said to you in a private message, that was a mistake. You'll note my vote was registered in the debate as being for it, so I'll appreciate it if you'd stop the insults. The only hypocrite here is you. You voted in favor when it was yours, but are suddenly against it, when the only change has been me proposing it instead of you. OOC: I was gone when February rolled around. |
| Date | 03:22:52, June 24, 2005 CET | From | Proletariat Revolution Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 2070 |
| Message | JUst because I wanted one earlier, doesn't mean I want one afterward. I had bills I wanted to pass. |
| Date | 06:48:44, June 24, 2005 CET | From | People's Party | To | Debating the Call for early elections, August 2070 |
| Message | This bill has already been defeated... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 46 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 77 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 77 |
| Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
| Random quote: "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, okay? It's, like, incredible." - Donald Trump |