Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 02:33:27
Server time: 01:26:32, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): ADM Drax | Harvey Dent | Kubrick2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Traditional Military Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Gnazenal Phr'unt

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2256

Description[?]:

Beacuse allowing gays, foreigners and women in the front line undermines the morale and effectiveness of the real soldiers.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:54:00, July 13, 2006 CET
FromBlack People's Party
ToDebating the Traditional Military Bill
MessageThat is discrimination. If I were gay or a woman and I joined the military, I would want to have equal opportunity to prove that I am just as good as a soldier as the majority of the people in the military.

Date23:07:12, July 13, 2006 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Traditional Military Bill
MessageNo; for obvious reasons.

Date01:40:57, July 14, 2006 CET
FromWhite People's Party
ToDebating the Traditional Military Bill
Messagewe support. with rules like this we won't have to worry about god's wrath when we go to battle.

;)

Date10:23:55, July 14, 2006 CET
FromGnazenal Phr'unt
ToDebating the Traditional Military Bill
MessageBPP, that is the point. The only reason gays and women are allowed in the front line is because of equality, not because it makes military sense.

Date04:51:54, July 15, 2006 CET
FromBlack People's Party
ToDebating the Traditional Military Bill
MessageEvery soldier is trained the same...

Date15:08:22, July 16, 2006 CET
FromConservative People's Party
ToDebating the Traditional Military Bill
MessageWomen are not as physically adept as men.. we support

Date10:20:15, July 17, 2006 CET
FromGnazenal Phr'unt
ToDebating the Traditional Military Bill
MessageExactly, although the few women that do pass the training are of the same fitness, it is an undeniable strain on resources and morale, all in the name of equality, not in the name of logic or military effectiveness.

Date18:33:56, July 17, 2006 CET
FromBlack People's Party
ToDebating the Traditional Military Bill
MessageSome of the best soldiers have been women, many of them pilots and snipers. If this military can't train women and gays to be effective then I don't think they are effective at all...

Date18:58:14, July 17, 2006 CET
FromGnazenal Phr'unt
ToDebating the Traditional Military Bill
MessageRubbish, the military shouldn't have to persue equality simply because that is what politicians desire.

Date19:59:28, July 17, 2006 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Traditional Military Bill
MessageNo, they should because it's the humane thing to do.

Though I suppose the military isn't in the business of being humane.

Date11:25:40, July 18, 2006 CET
FromGnazenal Phr'unt
ToDebating the Traditional Military Bill
MessageExactly, the DSPL illustrate the point perfectly. The only reason certain people are allowed in the military is to further equality, regardless of the fact that equality is meaningless in an environment such as the military.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 140

no
   

Total Seats: 514

abstain
  

Total Seats: 47


Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English.

Random quote: "A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 77