We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: !
Details
Submitted by[?]: Roman Imperialist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2257
Description[?]:
| !. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting nationality (national of this state without implication of having citizenship rights).
Old value:: Only those born in this country or to nationals receive nationality.
Current: Anyone is able to claim nationality.
Proposed: Anyone receives nationality but immigrants must pass a test to gain nationality.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The distribution, purchasing and possession of material depicting pornographic acts.
Old value:: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Current: Pornography depicting consenting adults is legal for adults.
Proposed: All forms of pornography are legal, but only for adults.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The recreational drug policy.
Old value:: The use of cannabis is legal.
Current: Recreational drug use is regulated by local governments.
Proposed: All naturally occurring drugs are legal.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards smoking.
Old value:: Smoking is legal everywhere, at the discretion of the property owner, and is legal in government-owned buildings.
Current: Smoking is only allowed in private homes and clubs.
Proposed: Smoking is legal everywhere, at the discretion of the property owner, but is illegal in government-owned buildings.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:55:13, July 15, 2006 CET | From |  New Daio Party | To | Debating the ! |
| Message | Article 1 and 4? No problem. Article 2? No. I see it as a growth issue. Article 3? No thank you. Not without specific provision for companies being allowed to deny employment over any testable substances. |
| Date | 07:44:52, July 15, 2006 CET | From | Konoha Shinobinin | To | Debating the ! |
| Message | Articles 1 and 4 can have our support (as little as that is). Not a big fan of Article 3. I can live with Article 2, but would prefer not. |
| Date | 22:18:40, July 15, 2006 CET | From | Roman Imperialist Party | To | Debating the ! |
| Message | Sato, care to explain how 2 is a "growth issue"? |
| Date | 07:52:25, July 16, 2006 CET | From | Party for the Promotion of Pandas | To | Debating the ! |
| Message | haha, I shouldnt be suprised, but Im the opposite of Daoi. I like articles 3 and 2. Article 1 I dont like, and article 4 I really could care less, but Id rather not mess with the status quo there. |
| Date | 02:07:47, July 17, 2006 CET | From | New Daio Party | To | Debating the ! |
| Message | Apologies. 2 is the way it is to prevent rape pronography and pedophilic pronography. |
| Date | 15:45:46, July 17, 2006 CET | From | Roman Imperialist Party | To | Debating the ! |
| Message | Article 3 bumped down a notch. |
| Date | 05:52:13, July 19, 2006 CET | From | Party for the Promotion of Pandas | To | Debating the ! |
| Message | i still like 2 and 3. I think I might run off and propose those. If youd vote for them, I think they might pass. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 145 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 188 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "All history has been a history of class struggles between dominated classes at various stages of social development." - Friedrich Engels |