Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5474
Next month in: 02:07:56
Server time: 17:52:03, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Protect Our Children Reinstated

Details

Submitted by[?]: AM Radical Libertarian Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2258

Description[?]:

Children are our future - we must protect them in order to allow them to grow up able to be rational adults, capable of making life style choices.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:05:34, July 19, 2006 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Protect Our Children Reinstated
MessageThese propsals seem reasonable. I beleive that our citizens should have the right to a non-smoking area, particularly at their place of work. Additionally, there are strong arguments for licensing the sale of alcohol, both fiscal and social.

We would support this Bill in it's current form, but would happily see it strengthened.

FML

Date22:26:21, July 19, 2006 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Protect Our Children Reinstated
MessageCitizens have every right to a non-smoking area. Smokine would be allowed only at the discretion of the property owner; so all they need to do is to convince the owner to not allow it in part or all of his property.

Date22:32:22, July 19, 2006 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Protect Our Children Reinstated
MessageIn a perfect world, this would indeed be the case. Unfortunately, I fear for non-smokers in low-paid jobs, who are gping to be forced into conflict with a pro-smoking employer, or in a workplace where a majority are happy with smoking, and I feel that non smokers deserve an element of protection.

We will support, but as we said, we would look, in future, to perhaps go a step further...

FML


Date23:04:08, July 19, 2006 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Protect Our Children Reinstated
MessageThe AAP finds this curiously conservative and restrictive. We must oppose. If Article 2 was separate, we could support that.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 424

no
 

Total Seats: 76

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: It is not allowed to call more than 5 elections in 5 game years in a nation. The default sanction for a player persisting in the early election tactic will be a seat reset.

    Random quote: "In Germany they first came for the Communists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me--and by that time no one was left to speak up." - Pastor Martin Niemoller

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 75