We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defence Budget
Details
Submitted by[?]: One Nation Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2258
Description[?]:
| The One Nation Conservative Party propose to adjust the government's defence budget to better address the current international situation. |
Proposals
Article 1
| Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
| Head of Government | 12,000,000,000 PON | 50,000,000 PON | 50,000,000 PON |
| Foreign Affairs | 28,000,000,000 PON | 1,000,000,000 PON | 1,000,000,000 PON |
| Internal Affairs | 350,000,000,000 PON | 35,000,000,000 PON | 35,000,000,000 PON |
| Finance | 50,000,000,000 PON | 2,000,000,000 PON | 2,000,000,000 PON |
| Defence | 90,000,000,000 PON | 88,000,000,000 PON | 96,000,000,000 PON |
| Justice | 0 PON | 34,000,000,000 PON | 34,000,000,000 PON |
| Infrastructure and Transport | 100,000,000,000 PON | 13,000,000,000 PON | 13,000,000,000 PON |
| Health and Social Services | 0 PON | 800,000,000 PON | 800,000,000 PON |
| Education and Culture | 0 PON | 1,200,000,000 PON | 1,200,000,000 PON |
| Science and Technology | 80,000,000,000 PON | 25,000,000,000 PON | 25,000,000,000 PON |
| Food and Agriculture | 0 PON | 250,000,000 PON | 250,000,000 PON |
| Environment and Tourism | 0 PON | 1,500,000,000 PON | 1,500,000,000 PON |
| Trade and Industry | 60,000,000,000 PON | 1,000,000,000 PON | 1,000,000,000 PON |
| Total | 770,000,000,000 PON | 202,800,000,000 PON | 210,800,000,000 PON |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:42:37, July 21, 2006 CET | From |  One Nation Conservative Party | To | Debating the Defence Budget |
| Message | Apologies to the Defence and Finance Ministers but this really is urgent. |
| Date | 01:12:09, July 21, 2006 CET | From | Sect of the Green Moon | To | Debating the Defence Budget |
| Message | No, it is not. |
| Date | 12:01:57, July 21, 2006 CET | From | One Nation Conservative Party | To | Debating the Defence Budget |
| Message | It is customary to inform the government before storming into our chamber. I don't believe the Pontesian Parliament need take advice from a party that believes Beitenyu 'own' our people like common cattle. |
| Date | 22:49:11, July 21, 2006 CET | From | Fight For Your Right To Party | To | Debating the Defence Budget |
| Message | Given that we are going to war, an increase in defence spending is certainly justified. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 501 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Characters are considered to be "owned" by the player who first mentioned or created them. In practice, players may share responsibility for role-playing a character, but ultimate authority rests with the owner. |
| Random quote: "You can't get rid of poverty by giving people money." - P. J. O'Rourke |