Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5474
Next month in: 01:14:21
Server time: 18:45:38, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AethanKal | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Secularisation Act of May 2258

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2259

Description[?]:

A bill to ensure that there is complete separation of church and state and individuals are not forcefully subjected to religious practices at work, home, or school.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:47:25, July 23, 2006 CET
From Iqembu Sokusebenzisana Yeningi
ToDebating the Secularisation Act of May 2258
MessageThe IPC acknowledges that the school prayer issue is open to debate. There are reasonable arguments on both sides. However, the IPC feels that the ability of religions to organize schools if they see fit is inseperable from the basic rights of freedom of religion and freedom of assembly. Accordingly, we have no choice but to oppose this bill.

Date04:13:41, July 23, 2006 CET
From Liberal Party
ToDebating the Secularisation Act of May 2258
MessageAs per current statutes, religions have no inherent rights to freedom of collective speech, and are limited to personal evangelism in recruiting efforts. It is a grave violation of the rights of the child to place them in a position whereby they are subjected to peer and authority figure pressure to participate in certain practices that answer to a specific religious or political doctrine.

Date04:29:14, July 23, 2006 CET
From Iqembu Sokusebenzisana Yeningi
ToDebating the Secularisation Act of May 2258
MessageLooking to current statutes to define inherent rights is one area where the IPC feels that the IGP has gone wrong.

Date23:43:59, July 23, 2006 CET
From Ikradonian Faith Party
ToDebating the Secularisation Act of May 2258
MessageIn light of this proposal, which we oppose staunchly, the IFP will retract its support for the IGP's cabinet proposal.

Date04:29:25, July 24, 2006 CET
From Liberal Party
ToDebating the Secularisation Act of May 2258
MessageWhere else are rights to be defined? If we define our own rights on an individual basis, they mean nothing to anyone but ourselves. This is a democracy, and for better or for worse, the Ikradoni people have determined their collective rights. That is not, however, the question at hand. The question is whether or not we can, in good conscience, allow children to be forcefully subjected to religious acts with which they might not agree or feel comfortable. No one should have the right to impress religion or religious activities upon anyone else.

Date05:16:23, July 24, 2006 CET
From Iqembu Sokusebenzisana Yeningi
ToDebating the Secularisation Act of May 2258
MessageBy the same logic, you might argue why the children should be subjected to pornography. The IPC is willing to trust families, schools, and the children themselves to make the decisions as to what information chilfdren should have access to. *Requiring* prayer is not allowed by current law -- simply organizing it, however, is.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 181

no
  

Total Seats: 283

abstain
   

Total Seats: 135


Random fact: Particracy has 464 player slots.

Random quote: "Africa is poor because its investors and its creditors are unspeakably rich" - Naomi Klein

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62