We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sukins Housing Control Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Catholic Workers Union
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2260
Description[?]:
Brett H. Sukins, DLF MP, proposes that all housing be placed under government control to insure equality of conditions among all Telamonites. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government policy regarding housing.
Old value:: The state provides public housing to low-income families.
Current: The state provides public housing to low-income families.
Proposed: The state owns and maintains all housing.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:43:21, July 25, 2006 CET | From | Telamon Patriots' Bloc | To | Debating the Sukins Housing Control Bill |
Message | Do you have any idea what kind of a beurocracy this would create? Plus, all Telamonians dream of owning their own house that they can build and shape in any way they wish. This proposal creates a nation of Levittowns. Oh yea: In accordance with the Pledge of July 2258, we vote against this piece of legislation proposed by fasco-communists who conspire against the core ideals of Telamon. |
Date | 03:49:51, July 25, 2006 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the Sukins Housing Control Bill |
Message | The DLF does not shy away from the difficult task of governing a truly democratic, cooperative commonwealth. IF the MLP does, perhaps they ought to resign and allow a party up to the task of overcoming difficulties take on such tasks. |
Date | 03:50:45, July 25, 2006 CET | From | Telamon Patriots' Bloc | To | Debating the Sukins Housing Control Bill |
Message | Har har. |
Date | 16:56:32, July 25, 2006 CET | From | Páirtí Sóisialach | To | Debating the Sukins Housing Control Bill |
Message | Really, DLF, where did your party members get their names? Were they all Russian imigrants born in Durham Royal Hospital? I digress. Your proposal is so wrong on so many levels, I wouldn't know where no begin: no. |
Date | 03:12:16, July 26, 2006 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the Sukins Housing Control Bill |
Message | We didn't expect you to say yes, jeepers. And we are embarassed that the CUP has chosen to mock the ethnicity of our party members. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes |
Total Seats: 185 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 461 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
Random quote: "Non-violence leads to the highest ethics, which is the goal of all evolution. Until we stop harming all other living beings, we are still savages." - Thomas A. Edison |