Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5470
Next month in: 02:11:14
Server time: 01:48:45, April 17, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Media Reforms Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Fundamentalists First

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2263

Description[?]:

Release the state's stranglehold on all media...

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:19:39, July 29, 2006 CET
FromFundamentalists First
ToDebating the Media Reforms Act
MessageArticle 4 may be removed, however I do not see a reason from stopping anyone showing pornography any time of the day... The media companies are out to make a profit, so no one will want to show anything that wont get any viewers... so they probably will not show pornography duing times when children watch, however no one should restrict their wishes to do so...

Date11:53:59, July 29, 2006 CET
FromProgressive Democratic Party
ToDebating the Media Reforms Act
MessageWe support Articles 1 to 3. The sad fact is, there's always a demand for porn, no matter what time of day it is, so there's going to be the risk of kids seeing something they're not ready for.

Date00:24:05, July 30, 2006 CET
FromTelamon Patriots' Bloc
ToDebating the Media Reforms Act
MessageWe absolutely support Articles 1-3, but having Article 4 may forces us to vote no. Remove that and you have our full support.

Date01:55:43, July 30, 2006 CET
FromCatholic Workers Union
ToDebating the Media Reforms Act
MessageWe oppose Articles 1, 2, and 3.

We oppose Articles 1 and 2 because they suggest that the rest of the channels would be privatized. This is a hideous proposal, and would seriously hurt our excellent Telamonite television. In the future we might support turning all channels over to nonprofit organizations.

We oppose Article 3 because it allows hate speech and racist filth to be broadcast all day.

Article 4 we could concievably support, although it probably goes too far.

Date02:38:42, July 30, 2006 CET
FromTelamon Patriots' Bloc
ToDebating the Media Reforms Act
MessageThe same party that supported that moronic nudist doesn't support Article 4?!?

Date20:07:59, July 30, 2006 CET
FromCatholic Workers Union
ToDebating the Media Reforms Act
MessageWell, nudity and sexually explicit television are two entirely different things.

Date03:29:13, July 31, 2006 CET
FromPáirtí Sóisialach
ToDebating the Media Reforms Act
MessageWe don't accept article 3, though we love articles 1-2. Sorry.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 0

no
  

Total Seats: 601

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players should not role-play characters without the consent of the owner, and if they find they have role-played the character beyond what the owner intended, they should withdraw or amend the role-play appropriately.

    Random quote: "The proletarians of the world have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workers of all countries: unite!" - Karl Marx

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 78