We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sea Law Act of 2071
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Centrist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2073
Description[?]:
| See here: http://aiglesrv.no-ip.info:8080/particracy/wiki/index.php/Law_of_the_Sea # Absolute jurisdiction (Exclusive Economic Zone) of 100km from the shore, where this zone does not overlap with that of another country. # Transient jurisdiction (Transit and Harvesting Zone) of 500km from the shore, where this zone does not overlap with that of another country. # Where zones meet or overlap, the border shall be set at the median (halfway) line between land masses. For neighbouring countries, sea borders should extend perpendicular to the coast. # Prior claims and disputes to be determined by the World Court. # A requirement that internal laws be amended to reflect the agreed-upon rules. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:53:23, June 25, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Sea Law Act of 2071 |
| Message | Any comments on this? |
| Date | 23:24:39, June 25, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Sea Law Act of 2071 |
| Message | If by harvsting you imply DST then i appose. If you dont pleae make it clear. |
| Date | 04:58:21, June 26, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Sea Law Act of 2071 |
| Message | I would like you to make clear your objection. What, for example, is DST? |
| Date | 06:28:13, June 26, 2005 CET | From | People's Party | To | Debating the Sea Law Act of 2071 |
| Message | We will support |
| Date | 16:48:18, June 26, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Sea Law Act of 2071 |
| Message | I'll take this to vote. I can't really amend it, anyways, since it's an international treaty. |
| Date | 16:54:53, June 26, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the Sea Law Act of 2071 |
| Message | I think DST is deep sea trawling, as mentioned in the other sea bill. |
| Date | 17:38:58, June 26, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Sea Law Act of 2071 |
| Message | RWLP: Within the first 100 km, Likatonia has absolute jurisdiction and we can pass any law we like regarding them. |
| Date | 17:40:18, June 26, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Sea Law Act of 2071 |
| Message | Within the first 500 km, we can still pass laws regarding harvesting and military activity, but no others. I suppose that would mean we could legislate on DST as well. |
| Date | 07:45:17, June 27, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Sea Law Act of 2071 |
| Message | Deep Sea Trawling or Bottom Trawling ie weighted hooked nets that go down to the seafloor and strip it clear of niegh on all resources. DST or BT is worth about 80% of all fishieries but its unsustainable |
| Date | 11:00:26, June 27, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Sea Law Act of 2071 |
| Message | So in other words, we need to pass a second bill to phase out that practice. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 200 | |||||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position. |
| Random quote: "Men who have greatness in them don't go in for politics." - Albert Camus |