We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: A few Ecological proposals
Details
Submitted by[?]: Sustainable Development Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2263
Description[?]:
| 1. The forests are owned by the government, but we see no reason not to let private companies work as sub-contractors. 2. If the government disposes only special waste, what happens to all the ordinary residential waste? Though we do believe private companies should be responsible for their waste themselves. 3. We see no reason for water used for industrial purposes to be of high drinking standards. Less money and effort will go into cleaning all the water in the country |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns all forests, but subcontracts the work to private companies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: Government disposes special waste only.
Current: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Proposed: Private companies are responsible for disposing of their own waste. The government disposes of residential waste.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water.
Old value:: The government sets a single standard to ensure all tap water is drinkable.
Current: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Proposed: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:38:47, July 30, 2006 CET | From | Johnson Democratic Party | To | Debating the A few Ecological proposals |
| Message | i'd vote for this. |
| Date | 21:52:40, July 30, 2006 CET | From | Dranland Progressive Conservatives | To | Debating the A few Ecological proposals |
| Message | Yes. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 400 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Moderation will not approve a Cultural Protocol request within the first 48 hours of it being requested. This is in order to give other players a chance to query the proposed changes, if they wish to do so. Moderation may be approached for advice on a proposed change, but any advice proffered should always be understood under the provisio that no final decision will be made until at least 48 hours after the request has been formally submitted for approval. |
| Random quote: "Victory attained by violence is tantamount to a defeat, for it is momentary." - Mahatma Gandhi |