We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The regulation of higher education

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Libertarian party of Darnussia

Status^[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2072

Description^[?]:

as the current laws would make it possible to provide better education to richer students.

Proposals

Article 1

Proposal^[?] to change The regulation of higher education.

Old value:: The government allows private higher education but regulates it to meet nationally set standards.

Current: The government does not fund any public higher education institutions, permitting only private higher education institutions to exist.

Proposed: The government does not allow private higher education institutions.

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	04:00:47, June 26, 2005 CET
From	Libertarian party of Darnussia
To	Debating the The regulation of higher education
Message	ohw wait my argument is false since the state pays all education... well in that case the private university's are useless...

Date	04:13:26, June 26, 2005 CET
From	Social Democratic Party of Darnussia
To	Debating the The regulation of higher education
Message	A much better ill has been proposed by the Social Equality Party, I urge everyone to support that bill and not this bill which will decrease the standard of education in Darnussia. I think we give the bill made by SEP a chance

Date	04:22:57, June 26, 2005 CET
From	Progressive Democratic Alliance
To	Debating the The regulation of higher education
Message	This is not needed, I already proposed a bill on higher education. If my bill passes, the private higher education will have to be exactly like the public ones meaning they will not provide better education to richer students. I created the bill for the specific purpose of providing equal opportunity, something this country lacks. I thought the current law of higher education was written by the communists since the Communist Party failed to react on this issue for such a long time. Now please, end this senseless partisan bickering, this is not the way mature individuals act.

Date	04:51:48, June 26, 2005 CET
From	Social Libertarian party
To	Debating the The regulation of higher education
Message	I like the other bill better.

Date	05:14:24, June 26, 2005 CET
From	Libertarian party of Darnussia
To	Debating the The regulation of higher education
Message	no private education has to meet the standarts of public ones, so they can have higher standards...

Date	05:35:52, June 26, 2005 CET
From	Social Libertarian party
To	Debating the The regulation of higher education
Message	If rich kids get better education it's fine, as long as it's not detrimental to other education efforts.

Date	10:00:51, June 26, 2005 CET
From	People's Progressive Party
To	Debating the The regulation of higher education
Message	We support the SEP's bill rather than this excessive bill.

Date	16:13:18, June 26, 2005 CET
From	Libertarian party of Darnussia
To	Debating the The regulation of higher education
Message	whats fine about receiving better education beceause you have more wealth!

Date	16:33:57, June 26, 2005 CET
From	Progressive Democratic Alliance
To	Debating the The regulation of higher education
Message	You don't understand anything do you? Our higher education bill will eliminate the need for private higher education meaning that they will have the same effect. By nationally set standards means they have to teach the same way that public higher education teaches and because the government fully-subsidizes tuition anyway, students from poverty-stricken families will be able to go to private higher education anyway.

Date	16:47:19, June 26, 2005 CET
From	Libertarian party of Darnussia
To	Debating the The regulation of higher education
Message	it would not eliminate the need, it would just give the private sector standards to follow they can have higher standards and will therefore it's useless... the entire private sector would literally GET money from the government

Date	16:47:47, June 26, 2005 CET
From	Libertarian party of Darnussia
To	Debating the The regulation of higher education
Message	so it would not enihalate an elite ruling the education it would merely satte-fund this elite!

Date	16:48:13, June 26, 2005 CET
From	Libertarian party of Darnussia
To	Debating the The regulation of higher education
Message	yes yes, just call the other an idiopt beceause he disagrees with you... makes you look very smart!

Date	16:53:43, June 26, 2005 CET
From	Progressive Democratic Alliance
To	Debating the The regulation of higher education
Message	Can't you see I voted yes? Do not make me change my mind by hurling insults at me.

Date	17:00:10, June 26, 2005 CET
From	Libertarian party of Darnussia
To	Debating the The regulation of higher education
Message	so it was no anti-post? hmmm... i alreayd found it strange argumentation but it was beneeth my post :D

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Total Seats: 366

Social Democratic Party (206)
Social Democratic Party of Darnussia (70)
Chinkopodian Economic Democrats (54)
Social Libertarian party (23)
People's Progressive Party (20)
Wurzelmaniac Party (11)

Total Seats: 384

abstain

Total Seats: 0

Random fact: Dorvik is a nation based on Germanic and old Prussian cultures, it is located on the far north of Artania, making it an almost arctic nation.

Random quote: "The National Rifle Association says, 'Guns don't kill people; people kill people,' but I think the gun helps." - Eddie Izzard

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 75