We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sanctity of Property
Details
Submitted by[?]: AM Radical Libertarian Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2270
Description[?]:
| As promised, we are revisiting the area of private property and the government. If a property owner wants to keep his home, the government should have to respect that decision. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Current: The government may not seize private property.
Proposed: The government may not seize private property.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:15:01, August 09, 2006 CET | From | Likaton Fascist Front | To | Debating the Sanctity of Property |
| Message | We feel that the government should be allowed to seize property for vital government works, otherwise the entire society pays. Open slather on this point is wrong as well, but as long as checks and balnces are in place we feel there are reasonable outcomes to disputes. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 222 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 66 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 122 |
| Random fact: Alduria, Rildanor and Lourenne all have Canrilaise (French) cultures. |
| Random quote: "Sometimes democracy must be bathed in blood." - Augusto Pinochet |