We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of November 2266
Details
Submitted by[?]: Freedom and Justice Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2267
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Freedom and Justice Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Freedom and Justice Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Freedom and Justice Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Freedom and Justice Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Freedom and Justice Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Liberty and Prosperity Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:55:00, August 10, 2006 CET | From | Dolgarian Imperial Revivalists | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2266 |
| Message | ? |
| Date | 02:03:40, August 11, 2006 CET | From |  Imperial Dolgarian Military Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2266 |
| Message | Whoa... A Cabinet Proposal?! |
| Date | 03:38:11, August 11, 2006 CET | From | Freedom and Justice Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2266 |
| Message | Well, ya. SDU is gone, and I'm holding the office of Emperor. It has to be done. |
| Date | 15:36:30, August 11, 2006 CET | From | Dolgarian Imperial Revivalists | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2266 |
| Message | How about including someone other than the LPP? |
| Date | 15:37:22, August 11, 2006 CET | From | Dolgarian Imperial Revivalists | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2266 |
| Message | In fact, I'd vote in favour of pretty much any coalition that didn't involve the LPP, simply because they have been in far, far too many governments for it to be healthy... |
| Date | 20:04:32, August 11, 2006 CET | From | Imperial Dolgarian Military Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2266 |
| Message | If LPP votes yes, then this gets passed... Anyways, yeah, why LPP? |
| Date | 21:58:41, August 13, 2006 CET | From | Liberty and Prosperity Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2266 |
| Message | Sorry, wasn;t here. |
| Date | 22:06:16, August 13, 2006 CET | From | Liberty and Prosperity Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 2266 |
| Message | And don't use excuses for the fact that you despise my involvement here, DUP (SID) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 216 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 370 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 164 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "Laundry is the only thing that should be separated by color." - Author Unknown |