Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 01:04:49
Server time: 14:55:10, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Paulo Nogueira | Spiguer | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Individual Rights Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Fundamentalists First

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2269

Description[?]:

The right of the indivdual must come before that of the state

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:19:28, August 13, 2006 CET
FromCatholic Workers Union
ToDebating the Individual Rights Act
MessageWe support article 2, but we oppose the others.

Article 1 allows parties like the TPB to organize and actively undermine and endanger our commonwealth.

Article 3 promotes the destruction of a national symbol.

And Article 4 allows some individuals to lie and damage others just because they are serving the common good by serving the public.

Date04:40:56, August 13, 2006 CET
FromFundamentalists First
ToDebating the Individual Rights Act
Message@ Art 1: If enough people feel the need to overrun a government, then they should have that right, same with #3, in a more symbolic way

@4: By public figures i was more talking about the low-life scum known as celebrities...

Date05:02:20, August 13, 2006 CET
FromCatholic Workers Union
ToDebating the Individual Rights Act
MessageEven celebrities have rights.

Our flag is the symbol of our nation, it must be protected. You wouldn't let terrorists destroy other national symbols in the name of freedom, would you?

What if it isn't the majority of the people who are advocating revolution, but a small, clustered, wealthy few with a lot of power and now the freedom to incite violent riots?

Date06:25:41, August 13, 2006 CET
FromFundamentalists First
ToDebating the Individual Rights Act
MessageIf it's a few, then they can be brought down by the majority who has the power to incite violent riots....
And about the flag: yes...
the third one i will remove....

Date18:32:08, August 13, 2006 CET
FromCatholic Workers Union
ToDebating the Individual Rights Act
MessageSo you'd let terrorists blow up the Parliament building if there were no people in it? The Parliament is a symbol of our democracy isn't it?

Date08:45:46, August 14, 2006 CET
FromFundamentalists First
ToDebating the Individual Rights Act
Messageblowing up is different to assembling....

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 111

no
 

Total Seats: 164

abstain
   

Total Seats: 326


Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections.

Random quote: "Radical left-wing ideologies must be stamped out." - Franklin McCarthy, former Solentian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62