Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5471
Next month in: 00:22:55
Server time: 23:37:04, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): Dx6743 | hexaus18 | hvnly6in | libdem555 | ShadowSneak | Tayes_Gad | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Anthem Take two

Details

Submitted by[?]: Adam Smith Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2073

Description[?]:

A reproposal for those that missed the vote.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:20:01, June 26, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the National Anthem Take two
MessageWe have already debated this, and there appears to be consensus on the two layered formal/informal aproach We are moving this directly to voting.

Date19:21:15, June 26, 2005 CET
FromChorus of Amyst
ToDebating the National Anthem Take two
Message(( Sorry for missing the vote last time. ))

Date15:20:28, June 27, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the National Anthem Take two
MessageWell that has been scuppered then.

Ant reasons why you have chosen to vote against this from those parties that have done so?

Date18:03:07, June 27, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the National Anthem Take two
Message(I think the Council-Lite just wanted to change the 100% voting record it has with the Councl. :-P)

Date18:04:15, June 27, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the National Anthem Take two
Message(I think the Council-Lite just wanted to change the 100% voting record it has with the Councl. :-P)

Date18:26:14, June 27, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the National Anthem Take two
MessageWe need 300 votes to pass. If MLT votes "for", we fail by one vote.

Date18:52:12, June 27, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the National Anthem Take two
MessageRedo the math - 11

Date20:33:07, June 27, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the National Anthem Take two
Messageyou are correct...
fail by 11 votes then.

Date10:15:05, June 28, 2005 CET
FromLodamun Centre-Left Coalition
ToDebating the National Anthem Take two
MessageThe MLP thanks the SAP and former 2nd June Movement for voting down this bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 249

no
   

Total Seats: 161

abstain
 

Total Seats: 40


Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "From my point of view, the killing of another, except in defense of human life, is archistic, authoritarian, and therefore, no anarchist can commit such deeds. It is the very opposite of what anarchism stands for." - Jo Labadie

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67