We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Revised Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2072
Details
Submitted by[?]: Imperial Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2073
Description[?]:
| For the good of the people of Endralon, a government of unity across the spectrum, incorporating those parties most strongly supported by the electorate, in the spirit of democratic good faith. |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
Imperial Conservative Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Patriotic Libertarian Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Imperial Conservative Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Abandoned NFC Headquarters
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Patriotic Libertarian Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Abandoned NFC Headquarters
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Imperial Conservative Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Abandoned NFC Headquarters
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the International Socialist Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the International Socialist Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:51:30, June 27, 2005 CET | From | People's Liberation Front (PPP) | To | Debating the Revised Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2072 |
| Message | Voting for this, ISP, equals being a traitor to socialism. |
| Date | 02:53:42, June 27, 2005 CET | From | Abandoned NFC Headquarters | To | Debating the Revised Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2072 |
| Message | Ah, I can support this...finally, a decent cabinet. |
| Date | 02:55:10, June 27, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Conservative Party | To | Debating the Revised Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2072 |
| Message | Very good. To a vote! |
| Date | 02:59:17, June 27, 2005 CET | From | International Socialist Party | To | Debating the Revised Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2072 |
| Message | PPP you are very agressive for someone who did not vote for the Workers Bomb, what are you going to do when Kirlawa Drops the bomb on Endralon. |
| Date | 03:03:41, June 27, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Conservative Party | To | Debating the Revised Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2072 |
| Message | Typical socialist faction fight. Shame ISP, could have had your Worker's Bomb for sure under us! |
| Date | 03:32:48, June 27, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Conservative Party | To | Debating the Revised Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2072 |
| Message | Looks like Endralon is doomed to keeping its old cabinet (if that is really how it works) with no representation from all the parties who did best in the election, not only my own. So much for democracy and socialism co-existing! We should put this to a referendum... |
| Date | 12:32:28, June 27, 2005 CET | From | Communist Party of Endralon | To | Debating the Revised Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2072 |
| Message | How are coalitions undemocratic? If several smaller parties, put together, got more votes than the one or two larger parties, what's wrong with them forming a coalition against the larger (but non-majoritarian) parties? |
| Date | 13:14:32, June 27, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Conservative Party | To | Debating the Revised Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2072 |
| Message | Nothing - if you can all get together and get Smirnoff on your side. But if that party really is retired, then we're left with a totally divided chamber, with both sides below 50%. |
| Date | 13:17:05, June 27, 2005 CET | From | MLC Old Endralonian Resistance | To | Debating the Revised Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2072 |
| Message | the real issue is socialist cabinet vs capitalist cabinet people shouldnt have to vote for just one of the socialist parties to give this validity , a vote for any of us is a vote against you being in power. |
| Date | 21:13:42, June 27, 2005 CET | From | Patriotic Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Revised Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2072 |
| Message | I think this is a drawback of this game - after each elections the old cabinet should be dismissed, that what happens everywhere in the democratic world. |
| Date | 23:06:09, June 27, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Conservative Party | To | Debating the Revised Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2072 |
| Message | Yup. Also for the MLC's comment, I agree. And if the Smirnoff party is dead then we non-socialists won. If they're alive, then you won. Problem is no one seems to know! |
| Date | 05:26:10, June 28, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Conservative Party | To | Debating the Revised Unity Cabinet Proposal of July 2072 |
| Message | A new cabinet proposal is now up. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 163 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 261 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 235 |
| Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting. |
| Random quote: "I swear to the Lord I still can't see Why Democracy means Everybody but me." - Langston Hughes, The Black Man Speaks |