Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 02:35:36
Server time: 13:24:23, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Tayes3 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Yarmouth Health Regulation Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Catholic Workers Union

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2272

Description[?]:

This isn't radical. We're just asking that private health facilities be regulated and reviewed regularly to ensure that they're not performing any unsavory practices, like harvesting organs without consent or mistreating their patients.

It's a precautionary measure.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:47:19, August 19, 2006 CET
FromProgressive Democratic Party
ToDebating the Yarmouth Health Regulation Bill
Message"Private clinics are allowed" doesn't mean a free-for-all. Presumably, any sane government would already regulate against illegal organ retention. This looks like an excuse to nationalise more private healthcare to us; we thus oppose.

Date19:22:38, August 20, 2006 CET
FromCatholic Workers Union
ToDebating the Yarmouth Health Regulation Bill
MessageIt's not an excuse for nationalization, we're just attempting to ensure that private clinics aren't running wild.

Date19:53:28, August 20, 2006 CET
FromCatholic Workers Union
ToDebating the Yarmouth Health Regulation Bill
MessageI hope the SSPP will support another sane and moderate proposal to advance better healthcare.

Date21:56:08, August 20, 2006 CET
FromPáirtí Sóisialach
ToDebating the Yarmouth Health Regulation Bill
MessageI understand your motives, but they stem from trauma to your natural nationalistic tendencies. Though this move could be rational to some Conservatives in Britain who don't know any better, we cannot support the expansion of the state in this area.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 157

no
  

Total Seats: 119

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

    Random quote: "A good politician is quite as unthinkable as an honest burglar." - H. L. Mencken

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 55