Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 01:40:56
Server time: 14:19:03, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): RossLuthori | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Civil Liberties Package of 2272

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Imperial Hobrazian Front

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2272

Description[?]:

What the hell...

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:14:51, August 20, 2006 CET
FromSocial Democratic Liberal Party
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Package of 2272
Message1) No, our position on this is well-known.
2) No, how could letters then be used as evidence in court?
3) Unsure on this, but forced to vote no anyway due to the other proposals.

Date13:02:08, August 20, 2006 CET
FromCapitalizt Party
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Package of 2272
MessageNay on 2, Aye to 1 and 3. I will let this pass though...

Date13:36:34, August 20, 2006 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Civil Liberties Package of 2272
MessageNay on all.
1) Allowing the ownership of firearms only leads to increased violence within society and an increase in lawlessness.
2) As pointed out by our colleagues in the SDLP, letters must be available to be used in court as evidence.
3) Similar to the above problems, but evidence must be able to be used in criminal proceedings. This would limit the ability of the police to do their jobs as well as making it possible for innocent individuals to be detained in custody due to the inability of the police to force individuals to release evidence.

This entire bill does nothing to promote civil liberties, rather it increases the risk of lawlessness within this Country.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 247

no
  

Total Seats: 111

abstain
   

Total Seats: 42


Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play".

Random quote: "War crimes is such a lilliputian term for the atrocities committed by the Yeudish state." - Katrine Lorenzen, former Kazulian diplomat

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64