We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: POWs
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democrat Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2276
Description[?]:
| Prisoners of war shall be behaved in a good way so that the other countries may do the same to us! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the treatment of prisoners of war.
Old value:: Surrendering enemy combatants are summarily executed.
Current: Prisoners of war must be treated well, according to internationally-accepted standards.
Proposed: Prisoners of war must be treated well, according to internationally-accepted standards.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:55:43, August 30, 2006 CET | From |  Communist Party of Kazulia | To | Debating the POWs |
| Message | Why do we need prisoners of war? They would have committed the highest crimes against our country, yet we treat them well? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 65 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 35 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "We must face the fact that the preservation of individual freedom is incompatible with a full satisfaction of our views of distributive justice." - Friedrich August von Hayek |