Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5460
Next month in: 01:22:40
Server time: 10:37:19, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Call for early elections, January 2073

Details

Submitted by[?]: New Democracy

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.

Voting deadline: December 2074

Description[?]:

The Neoliberal Party decided to call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus.

Last election's results were confusing and created national instability, that can damage our economy. Thus, for our Democracy, we should have new elections.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:38:03, June 28, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Call for early elections, January 2073
MessageI support this proposal as we appear to have reached an impasse.

Date09:38:07, June 28, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Call for early elections, January 2073
MessageI support this proposal as we appear to have reached an impasse.

Date12:59:36, June 28, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Call for early elections, January 2073
MessageI am not so sure.

Date18:57:50, June 28, 2005 CET
From Humanist Socialist Party
ToDebating the Call for early elections, January 2073
MessageWe suspect "confusing" here is being used as a euphemism for "did not elect a right-wing coalition to power", but however.

There are still viable Cabinet proposals being debated from both wings. While we understand the reasoning behind it, this call may be a bit premature unless and until those possibilities are exhausted.

Date19:16:11, June 28, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Call for early elections, January 2073
MessageThe Senate is currently split pretty evenly between capitalists and socialists.

Saying their are two wings is being narrow minded.

There are two axes, economically liberal or authoritarian. (Right vs Left)

And socially liberal vs Authoritarian

I would class the Freedom party and LAP as socially and economically liberal. The Neoliberal and the Conservative party as economically liberal and socially conservative.

The others i am not so sure about. The RSDP is socially liberal but economically authoritarian. As are the HSP.

Date19:24:29, June 28, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Call for early elections, January 2073
MessageIt appears the more progressive Cabinet proposal now does have the support of a parliamentary majority.

Also, I wouldn't exactly describe the RSDP as "economically authoritarian", I think we're more "economically socialist". Free market, with regulations. ;-)

Date19:43:22, June 28, 2005 CET
From Humanist Socialist Party
ToDebating the Call for early elections, January 2073
MessageWe know about the two axes idea, but you know what we meant. For "wings" read "camps" or "blocs" if it helps.

RSDP: check your messages.

Date21:35:41, June 28, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Call for early elections, January 2073
MessageEconomically authoritarian and regulation are pretty similar. Social Democrats should not be socialist though.

Date17:13:15, June 29, 2005 CET
From Postmodern Party
ToDebating the Call for early elections, January 2073
MessageI would vote for.

Date13:33:30, June 30, 2005 CET
From New Democracy
ToDebating the Call for early elections, January 2073
MessageWell. Vote time.

Date13:41:08, June 30, 2005 CET
From Libertarian Alcoholic Par-tay
ToDebating the Call for early elections, January 2073
MessageSeems a bit pointless since we'll be having elections in a few game-months anyway.

Date13:42:15, June 30, 2005 CET
From New Democracy
ToDebating the Call for early elections, January 2073
Message(OOC: I'm too lazy to wait :P)

Date15:52:43, June 30, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Call for early elections, January 2073
MessageAgainst, voting would be reset when it need not be. I will wait for elections (only tomorrow, not long to wait)

Date16:08:35, June 30, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Call for early elections, January 2073
MessageGuess when voting is supposed to end on this proposal? That's right! In the month we'd be having our next elections anyway.

Date16:19:19, June 30, 2005 CET
From New Democracy
ToDebating the Call for early elections, January 2073
Messageooc: Well, this is a funny proposal :P

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 238

no
    

Total Seats: 222

abstain
  

Total Seats: 39


Random fact: Players must never be asked for their Particracy password. This includes Moderation; a genuine Moderator will never ask for your password.

Random quote: "I got nothing against no Viet Cong. No Vietnamese ever called me a nigger." - Muhammad Ali, 1967, refusing to fight in Vietnam

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 76