Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 00:37:02
Server time: 11:22:57, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Brazil25 | Dioskouros | Ost | Temitayo | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 2073

Details

Submitted by[?]: Imperial Conservative Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2073

Description[?]:

To resolve the constitutional deadlock, and represent the voters decision.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:27:20, June 28, 2005 CET
From Imperial Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
Message"Third time's a charm."

Date07:49:57, June 28, 2005 CET
From People's Liberation Front (PPP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
MessageHmmm....no...?

Date07:50:39, June 28, 2005 CET
From People's Liberation Front (PPP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
MessageI'd like to point out that you three parties do not have enough votes to pass this cabinet by yourself.

Date09:33:08, June 28, 2005 CET
From MLC Old Endralonian Resistance
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
Messagea leftist party is never goign to vote for a cabinet with right wing with the PLP or the ICP in it , we're perfectly happy to sit through this term with the old cabinet rather than letting you into power.

Date13:27:54, June 28, 2005 CET
From Patriotic Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
Messagedoesn't 306/606=50,5%? :)

Date15:22:13, June 28, 2005 CET
From Imperial Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
MessageYup. I think as long as the NFC vote for this, with the new arithmetic, it passes.

Date18:43:05, June 28, 2005 CET
From Communist Party of Endralon
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
MessageYes - just barely.

Date18:58:07, June 28, 2005 CET
FromNational Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
Message:-O The Communists have been removed from power!!! I shouldnt have left, then I could have been the one to do it lol.

Date20:05:41, June 28, 2005 CET
From Imperial Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
MessageVictory! I should I say vicTORY? :D

In the spirit of bad losership which the reds showed for our success, we will do likewise when the time comes that we lose power - and do what we can to keep an anti-democratic cabinet!

Time to govern.

Date20:24:12, June 28, 2005 CET
From Communist Party of Endralon
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
MessageOh come on, all we did was point out that we don't like nation crashers and it would have been nice of you to leave us alone.

It's not our fault your majority is so slim (50.5%) that you had trouble forming a cabinet. :p

Date20:37:21, June 28, 2005 CET
From Patriotic Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
MessageIt's clear, the commies can't even add ;)

Date20:59:37, June 28, 2005 CET
From People's Liberation Front (PPP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
MessageNation crashing and now flaming. Good job. Thumbs up.

Date21:20:23, June 28, 2005 CET
From Imperial Conservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
MessageI'd support (and asked Lievens about) a way of resolving such situations via referendum or even decision by Head of State. But anyway, to the accusations...!

Notice how the turnout was higher when there was more of a full spectrum for the voters to chose from?

And also notice that no-one (me included!) has donated to the site? We're all on the same level. What you see as 'nation crashing' I see as joining the same one as my friend who was here already (ISP) to compete on the issues.

Where's the rule each nation should be ruled by a clique?

Date21:54:16, June 28, 2005 CET
From People's Liberation Front (PPP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
MessageYou should read the conversations the other parties had with the Conservative Party that made him leave. Endralon is supposed to be set aside as a socialist nation. The other parties here wanted to keep it socialist. So what about turnout? We want a unified socialist nation. I was looking forward to compete with the other socialists here.

Date00:59:59, June 29, 2005 CET
FromNational Socialist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
MessageYes this is true. I left as I felt it would be in the best interests of the game in general to have at least one communist country in the game to create better RP and diplomatic situations. That is the reason I left. And, as the Communists explained to me, Endralon was originally very socialist on the opinion bars and it is not their fault it has been changed.

Date01:47:19, June 29, 2005 CET
From People's Liberation Front (PPP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2073
MessageExactly.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 306

no
     

Total Seats: 261

abstain
 

Total Seats: 39


Random fact: Players must never be asked for their Particracy password. This includes Moderation; a genuine Moderator will never ask for your password.

Random quote: “Where would the weapons and equipment come from once you've banned the defence industry? Will we be defended by all your hippy people hurling potatoes and cabbages?” - Margaret Woodhall, former Dranian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 82