We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Budget proposal of August 2286
Details
Submitted by[?]: Movimento Social PROGRESSO
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2287
Description[?]:
The Movimento Social PROGRESSO propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the República da Lusitânia. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
Head of Government | 200,000,000 DAR | 1,000,000,000 DAR | 500,000,000 DAR |
Foreign Affairs | 5,000,000,000 DAR | 17,000,000,000 DAR | 17,000,000,000 DAR |
Internal Affairs | 25,000,000,000 DAR | 25,000,000,000 DAR | 25,000,000,000 DAR |
Finance | 5,000,000,000 DAR | 15,000,000,000 DAR | 15,000,000,000 DAR |
Defence | 100,000,000,000 DAR | 55,000,000,000 DAR | 15,000,000,000 DAR |
Justice | 2,500,000,000 DAR | 30,000,000,000 DAR | 30,000,000,000 DAR |
Infrastructure and Transport | 20,000,000,000 DAR | 40,000,000,000 DAR | 40,000,000,000 DAR |
Health and Social Services | 80,000,000,000 DAR | 30,000,000,000 DAR | 30,000,000,000 DAR |
Education and Culture | 70,000,000,000 DAR | 45,000,000,000 DAR | 45,000,000,000 DAR |
Science and Technology | 20,000,000,000 DAR | 40,000,000,000 DAR | 40,000,000,000 DAR |
Food and Agriculture | 3,000,000,000 DAR | 5,000,000,000 DAR | 5,000,000,000 DAR |
Environment and Tourism | 30,000,000,000 DAR | 10,000,000,000 DAR | 10,000,000,000 DAR |
Trade and Industry | 40,000,000,000 DAR | 10,000,000,000 DAR | 20,000,000,000 DAR |
Total | 400,700,000,000 DAR | 323,000,000,000 DAR | 292,500,000,000 DAR |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:57:09, September 20, 2006 CET | From | Movimento Social PROGRESSO | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2286 |
Message | Medidas que não são de fundo, somente de correcção orçamental. Há uma significativa redução do orçamento das forças armadas, visto que não há ameaças externas reconhecíveis neste momento. |
Date | 20:12:06, September 20, 2006 CET | From | People's Party | To | Debating the Budget proposal of August 2286 |
Message | Como é evidente, o Partido Popular discorda completamente de TODAS as políticas que têm a vindo a ser tomadas e propostas por este Governo, pelo que jamais poderia concordar com um Orçamento por si proposto, dadas mesmo as profundas divergências ideológicas entre ambos os partidos! Para já, não concordamos com a redução escandalosa no sector da Defesa Nacional e depois jamais concordaremos com um Orçamento orientado por políticas em que as funções soberanas do Estado (Justiça, Administração Interna, Defesa) são relegadas para 2º plano sendo colocados em 1º plano sectores em que o Estado deveria tender para estar a reduzir gradualmente o seu peso (Educação, Cultura, Agricultura, Turismo, Indústria, Saúde). Totalmente em desacordo, logo votamos CONTRA! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 113 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 0 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 187 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "To the youth of America, I say, beware of being trivialized by the commercial culture that tempts you daily. I hear you saying often that you're not turned on by politics. The lessons of history are clear and portentous. If you do not turn onto politics, politics will turn on you." - Ralph Nader |