We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Chemical Safety & Testing Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Center-Right Coalition
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2289
Description[?]:
A bill to permit to testing of cosmetics and pharmaceutical drugs in rats and rodents in order to ensure their safety in a human population. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Current: Animals may not be used for testing cosmetics products.
Proposed: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:19:20, September 21, 2006 CET | From | Fenner Brockway Socialist Party | To | Debating the Chemical Safety & Testing Act |
Message | We agree with this bill. |
Date | 23:02:16, September 21, 2006 CET | From | Aldegar Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Chemical Safety & Testing Act |
Message | This makes quite a bit of sense, as drugs still in their experimental phase need testing on animals before they can be used on humans, in order to prevent harmful side effects. |
Date | 22:00:53, September 23, 2006 CET | From | Baltic Party of Aldegar | To | Debating the Chemical Safety & Testing Act |
Message | We agree with this bill. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 375 | |||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum. |
Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights |