We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: International Community Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Democratic Alliance
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2074
Description[?]:
| I suggest that the Most Serene Republic of Darnussia joins the Community of International States, a UN-style international organisation. http://aiglesrv.no-ip.info:8080/particracy/wiki/index.php/Community_of_International_States |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:36:17, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | We are an internationalist Party, We will vote for this |
| Date | 17:38:54, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | no, this would be too restricted towards our own policy |
| Date | 17:40:46, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Democratic Alliance | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | Restricted? What because it protects human and civil rights? |
| Date | 17:44:43, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | wouldn't this need a 2/3th majority btw? |
| Date | 17:45:07, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | and no they are to discuss these policies. |
| Date | 17:46:58, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | the community promotes peace and security? sure like Iraq? |
| Date | 17:47:42, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | sorry misunderstood forgot to read 11 |
| Date | 17:48:15, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | still stupid and a restriction beceause there would be peace-keeping troops beceause they are a military alliance but they will never invoke in military actions... |
| Date | 17:49:17, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | and they will not only discuss civil rights but also economic policy etc... it's too restricted! think of our national rights! |
| Date | 17:49:54, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | they also migth decide an embargo on another nation which is not against they're law which falls under trade policy etc... etc... |
| Date | 17:50:23, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | "The Community may decide to include new areas of policy for discussion should it so wish. " getting worse with the second... |
| Date | 17:52:04, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | and yes i also read the last part but i think this will be easily broken and just end up in people breaking off of the community. or adaptions to the community... |
| Date | 17:52:18, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | since they have the right to adapt. |
| Date | 18:50:54, June 29, 2005 CET | From | Vuloch Ca Korzia | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | I'm all in favour of intergovernmentalism. |
| Date | 09:16:37, June 30, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | Looks good to me, we're an internationalist party, so yes. |
| Date | 02:48:53, July 02, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the International Community Act |
| Message | We abstain. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 452 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 91 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 207 |
| Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer. |
| Random quote: "Democrats always assure us that deterrence will work, but when the time comes to deter, they're against it. " - Ann Coulter |