Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5474
Next month in: 01:36:40
Server time: 10:23:19, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AethanKal | Dx6743 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Animal Rights Act 2073

Details

Submitted by[?]: RSDP - Democratic Front

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2074

Description[?]:

An Act to prohibit the use of animals in cosmetics research.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:54:35, June 29, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act 2073
MessageNote that this does not mean that animals can't be used in medical research, but we believe that animals should not suffer because some people want to look good.

Date16:55:16, June 29, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act 2073
MessageAlso, there's the recent poll which indicated that not less than 63.84% of the Rutanians is against using animals for testing cosmetic products.

Date17:04:52, June 29, 2005 CET
FromPostmodern Party
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act 2073
Messageyou know my opinion about it ;-)

Date17:36:31, June 29, 2005 CET
FromNew Democracy
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act 2073
MessageFirst the humans. Then the animals. That's why we vote against.

Date18:18:31, June 29, 2005 CET
FromPostmodern Party
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act 2073
MessageFor crying out loud: it's about cosmetics :s

Date20:45:06, June 29, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Alcoholic Par-tay
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act 2073
MessageCosmetics are for people. People before animals.

Date21:49:45, June 29, 2005 CET
FromPostmodern Party
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act 2073
MessageCosmetics are luxury; you don't have to punish animals becaus women want to brush some paint on their faces :s

Date22:36:41, June 29, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Alcoholic Par-tay
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act 2073
MessageBut we kill animals every day. We don't absolutely have to, but we do. We could all live as vegetarians, but we chose not to, because animals are a lot less important than people.

Date23:35:59, June 29, 2005 CET
FromPostmodern Party
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act 2073
MessageYes, we have to, because we need those proteins. If we would all be vegetarians, we would have to get those out of vegetables, but that means we wouldn't have enough crops to feed us all.

Date07:19:43, June 30, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act 2073
MessageYou can get plenty of protein from vegetables...considering that the human race has done it for thousands of years and will keep on doing it (peasents generally didn't eat meat, far too expensive)

Date10:36:35, June 30, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act 2073
MessageI am sorry i part with you on this LAP but i also beleive that this must be regulated to prevent cruelty to animals. It is only cosmetics and it is not banning it so i will support this measure.

Date15:46:39, June 30, 2005 CET
From RSDP - Democratic Front
ToDebating the Animal Rights Act 2073
MessageWhat? Hey, why did the description of the proposal suddenly change?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
       

Total Seats: 351

no
  

Total Seats: 119

abstain
 

Total Seats: 29


Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left.

Random quote: "Abolition of a woman's right to abortion, when and if she wants it, amounts to compulsory maternity: a form of rape by the State." - Edward Abbey

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 78