We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Animal Rights Act 2073
Details
Submitted by[?]: RSDP - Democratic Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2074
Description[?]:
An Act to prohibit the use of animals in cosmetics research. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in cosmetics research.
Old value:: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is unregulated.
Current: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Proposed: The use of animals to test cosmetic products is regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:54:35, June 29, 2005 CET |
From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act 2073 | Message | Note that this does not mean that animals can't be used in medical research, but we believe that animals should not suffer because some people want to look good. |
Date | 16:55:16, June 29, 2005 CET |
From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act 2073 | Message | Also, there's the recent poll which indicated that not less than 63.84% of the Rutanians is against using animals for testing cosmetic products. |
Date | 21:49:45, June 29, 2005 CET |
From | Postmodern Party | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act 2073 | Message | Cosmetics are luxury; you don't have to punish animals becaus women want to brush some paint on their faces :s |
Date | 22:36:41, June 29, 2005 CET |
From | Libertarian Alcoholic Par-tay | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act 2073 | Message | But we kill animals every day. We don't absolutely have to, but we do. We could all live as vegetarians, but we chose not to, because animals are a lot less important than people. |
Date | 23:35:59, June 29, 2005 CET |
From | Postmodern Party | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act 2073 | Message | Yes, we have to, because we need those proteins. If we would all be vegetarians, we would have to get those out of vegetables, but that means we wouldn't have enough crops to feed us all. |
Date | 07:19:43, June 30, 2005 CET |
From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act 2073 | Message | You can get plenty of protein from vegetables...considering that the human race has done it for thousands of years and will keep on doing it (peasents generally didn't eat meat, far too expensive) |
Date | 10:36:35, June 30, 2005 CET |
From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Animal Rights Act 2073 | Message | I am sorry i part with you on this LAP but i also beleive that this must be regulated to prevent cruelty to animals. It is only cosmetics and it is not banning it so i will support this measure. |
subscribe to this discussion -
unsubscribeVoting
Vote |
Seats |
yes | Total Seats: 351 |
no | Total Seats: 119 |
abstain | Total Seats: 29 |
Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
Random quote: "Abolition of a woman's right to abortion, when and if she wants it, amounts to compulsory maternity: a form of rape by the State." - Edward Abbey |