We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Proposal To Withdraw From Keymon Doctrine Of Neutrality II

Details

Submitted by^[?]: United Liberal Alliance

Status^[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor^[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2291

Description^[?]:

Whilst we do not believe in the development or use of chemical and biological weapons, we put ourselves at a disadvantage by not allowing our scientists to research and develop into CBW technology in order to be able to counter the threat from those states which may have chemical and biological weapons, we would therefore suggest the withdrawal and redrafting of the Keymon Neutrality Treaty which currently prevents us from this sort of research and development.

Proposals

Article 1

Withdraw from the Keymon Doctrine of Neutrality II.

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	12:24:26, September 28, 2006 CET
From	Telamon Royalist Party
To	Debating the Proposal To Withdraw From Keymon Doctrine Of Neutrality II
Message	The Telamon Royalist Party is confused. You mention one type of policy change in the descriptive section of the bill, but the body of the bill has a different policy change altogether. We will abstain until the UCA figures out what it wants to be doing here.

Date	12:41:00, September 28, 2006 CET
From	United Liberal Alliance
To	Debating the Proposal To Withdraw From Keymon Doctrine Of Neutrality II
Message	I would hope if you re-read the description that it clears up any misunderstanding for you

Date	22:23:48, September 28, 2006 CET
From	Telamon Royalist Party
To	Debating the Proposal To Withdraw From Keymon Doctrine Of Neutrality II
Message	Hmm. We would have to asbstain from this, unfortunately. Although the elimination of the manditory state service is acceptible, as is the case-by-case approval of certain arms sales, the withdrawl from the Keymon Neutrality Agreement II is not. We will abstain.

Date	22:42:31, September 28, 2006 CET
From	P�irt� S�isialach
To	Debating the Proposal To Withdraw From Keymon Doctrine Of Neutrality II
Message	Could you separate the withdrawal from the articles?

Date	11:03:14, September 29, 2006 CET
From	United Liberal Alliance
To	Debating the Proposal To Withdraw From Keymon Doctrine Of Neutrality II
Message	Done

Date	13:21:04, September 29, 2006 CET
From	Catholic Workers Union
To	Debating the Proposal To Withdraw From Keymon Doctrine Of Neutrality II
Message	We will support. We never liked this second one.

Date	13:24:23, September 29, 2006 CET
From	United Liberal Alliance
To	Debating the Proposal To Withdraw From Keymon Doctrine Of Neutrality II
Message	It is in fact something to note that we are the only nation to have ratified this treaty other than the Grand Dutchy of Keymon itself

Date	20:48:10, September 29, 2006 CET
From	Catholic Workers Union
To	Debating the Proposal To Withdraw From Keymon Doctrine Of Neutrality II
Message	'Zactly. Remove it, put it to a vote.

Date	01:18:10, September 30, 2006 CET
From	Telamon Royalist Party
To	Debating the Proposal To Withdraw From Keymon Doctrine Of Neutrality II
Message	We're afraid we'll have to stand in opposition to our friends in the IADP this time. We vote no.

Date	17:06:58, September 30, 2006 CET
From	Catholic Workers Union
To	Debating the Proposal To Withdraw From Keymon Doctrine Of Neutrality II
Message	That's alright.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Catholic Workers Union (117)
United Liberal Alliance (79)

Total Seats: 196

Total Seats: 104

abstain

Nuncirist Party of Telamon (0)

Total Seats: 0

Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play".

Random quote: "The opportunity to serve our country, that is all we ask." - John Smith

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61