We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pet Freedom Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Itrapo fo Ausojo
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2294
Description[?]:
Animals are under the control of man, and government should not restrict that |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Current: The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets.
Proposed: All wild animals may be kept as pets, without any restrictions or precautions whatsoever.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:21:56, October 02, 2006 CET | From | National Radical Union | To | Debating the Pet Freedom Act |
Message | The title of this bill is quite cynical, isn't it? "Freedom for animals", while at the same time claiming that animals have no rights at all and may be kept however one likes? |
Date | 20:29:10, October 02, 2006 CET | From | Central Block | To | Debating the Pet Freedom Act |
Message | With this bill the possibility for children to be mauled in their beds is astronomical... |
Date | 19:49:31, October 04, 2006 CET | From | Freedom Party | To | Debating the Pet Freedom Act |
Message | The complete banning of ownership of wild animals is astronomical, we will vote for this in the hope that the other parties will see sense and follow us in allowing wild animals to be kept under certain conditions. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes |
Total Seats: 319 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 280 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation. |
Random quote: "Zardugal. . . very successfully almost managed to implement democracy on a global scale, a millennia ago. With a seat in the Security Council we can do it again." - Phoebe Ĥoniato, former Zardic politician |