Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5473
Next month in: 01:58:20
Server time: 14:01:39, April 23, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): lulus | New Thought | rezins | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ecology & Agriculture Reform Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2074

Description[?]:

Reforms^4.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:34:16, June 30, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the Ecology & Agriculture Reform Act
MessageIndustry will ignore any 'suggestions' by the governemnt... as accordance will impose loss of profits. We suggest moderate regulation so that citizens living near factories will be protected from polution. See 'Environment Protection Act'

Date02:35:04, June 30, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the Ecology & Agriculture Reform Act
MessageIn all else we agree.

Date07:25:18, June 30, 2005 CET
FromHosengott Nationalists
ToDebating the Ecology & Agriculture Reform Act
Messageon the grounds that it would help the economy for the people and that article one is one never brought to our attention before i must agree with you on this for we cannot allow species to be whiped out through our ignorance to them

Date13:39:04, June 30, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Ecology & Agriculture Reform Act
Message"Industry will ignore any 'suggestions' by the governemnt... as accordance will impose loss of profits. We suggest moderate regulation so that citizens living near factories will be protected from polution. See 'Environment Protection Act'"

While we agree, this is a first step in a process of tightening environmental restrictions. It is obvious that Baltusia is anti-environmentalist and therefore stronger regulations would not only be unacceptable amongst our people but other parties as well. Note that our party is well in favour of environmental restrictions but has to compromise for the time being.

Date14:16:13, June 30, 2005 CET
FromFamily First Party
ToDebating the Ecology & Agriculture Reform Act
MessageArticle 3 is perhaps not in the best interests of the nation overall. Article 4 is in the right step.

Overall, although there are some issues that the FFP has, it has our support.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
       

Total Seats: 275

no
  

Total Seats: 134

abstain
 

Total Seats: 1


Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that.

Random quote: "If we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people to not kill each other? Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want." - Mother Teresa of Calcutta quotes

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 76