We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: IADP Devolution Platform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Catholic Workers Union
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2294
Description[?]:
We remain commited to Canton Democracy and a true Canton Commonwealth. Devolution ho! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Civil defence is the government's policy on providing shelters to be used in the event of attacks on major cities, mainly nuclear attacks and bombing.
Old value:: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Current: The government builds and maintains a network of shelters across the nation.
Proposed: Local authorities are responsible for building and maintaining shelters.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Current: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Proposed: It is the responsibility of local governments to decide on waste disposal regulation.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:43:00, October 05, 2006 CET | From | Telamon Royalist Party | To | Debating the IADP Devolution Platform |
Message | We support this. These are too trivial for the federal government to be handling. |
Date | 11:59:45, October 05, 2006 CET | From | Telamon Socialist Party | To | Debating the IADP Devolution Platform |
Message | Indeed, we agree with these proposals. You have our support for this motion. |
Date | 20:17:38, October 05, 2006 CET | From | Revolutionary Communist Party | To | Debating the IADP Devolution Platform |
Message | The Government itself should be responsible. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 163 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 94 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 43 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others." - Ambrose Bierce |