Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5470
Next month in: 03:20:44
Server time: 16:39:15, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): ADM Drax | hyraemous | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Call for early elections, September 2294

Details

Submitted by[?]: Green Workers Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill requests an early election. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline. Elections will be held immediately if the bill passes.

Voting deadline: May 2295

Description[?]:

We, the Green Workers Party, call for early elections as soon as we can reach a consensus.

The older progressive parties are moribund and abstain continually. Bring forward elections so we can throw out the dead wood and bring in a truly representative parliament for the Lusitanian people!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:36:32, October 06, 2006 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party
ToDebating the Call for early elections, September 2294
Message"The Social Liberal Party feels that it is in the interest of Lusitania that the Popular Party sees out it's mandated time in office, for fear of a backlash at the polls next election. We still have work to do." - Guy Verhofstadt.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
   

Total Seats: 131

abstain
  

Total Seats: 77


Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 37