We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Commercio animali esotici, 2295
Details
Submitted by[?]: Partito Social-Liberista Istaliano
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2295
Description[?]:
| Se non sono in pericolo di estinzione, che problema c'è? |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of exotic animals.
Old value:: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep exotic animals.
Current: Everyone may keep exotic animals, the trade in exotic animals is unregulated.
Proposed: Everyone may keep exotic animals, but the trade in exotic animals is regulated by the government.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Current: The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets.
Proposed: Wild animals may be kept as pets; the owners of dangerous wild animals must take the necessary measures to ensure they can't escape.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:13:38, October 07, 2006 CET | From | Partito Borisista Istaliano - S.I. | To | Debating the Commercio animali esotici, 2295 |
| Message | Che starebbero meglio nel loro habitat. |
| Date | 12:14:38, October 07, 2006 CET | From |  Partito Social-Liberista Istaliano | To | Debating the Commercio animali esotici, 2295 |
| Message | Per questo, anche i cani, i maiali e le vacche. |
| Date | 13:04:36, October 07, 2006 CET | From | Partito Collettivista Internazionalista | To | Debating the Commercio animali esotici, 2295 |
| Message | Animali esotici = possibili malattie esotiche , non è una certezza ma ne vale la pena ? |
| Date | 14:04:39, October 07, 2006 CET | From | Partito Social-Liberista Istaliano | To | Debating the Commercio animali esotici, 2295 |
| Message | Direi di no, visto che l'afta epizoica, la sars, l'influenza aviaria e la sindrome della ecefalopatia spungiforme sono veicolate da animali non esotici. |
| Date | 17:10:40, October 07, 2006 CET | From | Partito Laico Riformista | To | Debating the Commercio animali esotici, 2295 |
| Message | Si, ma che senso ha avere un pitone o un'iguana in casa? |
| Date | 19:50:31, October 07, 2006 CET | From | Partito Social-Liberista Istaliano | To | Debating the Commercio animali esotici, 2295 |
| Message | Lo stesso che avere un cane, direi. |
| Date | 22:27:24, October 07, 2006 CET | From | Partito della Passione Rossa | To | Debating the Commercio animali esotici, 2295 |
| Message | No, dai, i ricchi che per sfizio si tengono leoni e tigri nei giardini è un abominio! |
| Date | 23:31:09, October 07, 2006 CET | From | Partito Social-Liberista Istaliano | To | Debating the Commercio animali esotici, 2295 |
| Message | Ricordiamo che fra gli animali esotici sono annoverati pappagalli e tartarughe terrestri. |
| Date | 14:43:38, October 08, 2006 CET | From | Partito della Passione Rossa | To | Debating the Commercio animali esotici, 2295 |
| Message | Ho capito, ma anche leoni e tigri! Zebre e rinoceronti, coccodrilli e condor. No, non si dovrebbe permettere. |
| Date | 14:52:18, October 10, 2006 CET | From | Partito Social-Liberista Istaliano | To | Debating the Commercio animali esotici, 2295 |
| Message | Infatti il commercio è regolato. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 344 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 189 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 66 |
| Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
| Random quote: "Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it." - George Bernard Shaw |