We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear disarmament intent treaty
Details
Submitted by[?]: Edelweiss Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2075
Description[?]:
As I am allowed to be so free as to say that the LFP - founder of the conference regarding a worldwide nuclear disarmament intent treaty. As SocialGreens we would like to put pressure on the Republic of Likatonia to ask again to get this bill through! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Proposed: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:05:09, June 30, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty |
Message | Of course the LFP supports. However, I did not intend to pass this proposal to all nations and I object to you saying I did. That treaty forced no one to disarm except in the case that everyone else made the same promise or already had. |
Date | 16:14:12, June 30, 2005 CET | From | Edelweiss Party | To | Debating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty |
Message | I changed my description, sorry for the misunderstanding. |
Date | 01:44:00, July 02, 2005 CET | From | Proletariat Revolution Party | To | Debating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty |
Message | The title could be succinct. It's far too long. Though we support the content. |
Date | 03:08:34, July 02, 2005 CET | From | Söhne der Freiheit | To | Debating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty |
Message | The CTP wishes to preserve the right and sovereignty of Likatonia to defend itself in any manner it deems necessary at any time. We will not forfeit the rights of the Likatonian people to defend themselves. |
Date | 04:19:48, July 02, 2005 CET | From | National Centrist Party | To | Debating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty |
Message | We vote against this, for the pure reason that the Social Greens twisted our own treaty against us. That foul act of deception is an unacceptable way to promote an admirable goal. If you wish to promote peace, do not use lies to do it. |
Date | 10:46:28, July 02, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty |
Message | LFP: I think it was just a misunderstanding. Please don't let the good of Likatonia be compromised for your political pride. Keep some perspective. |
Date | 11:49:40, July 02, 2005 CET | From | People's Party | To | Debating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty |
Message | I am now thoroughly confused... I think i'll just vote for LFP |
Date | 18:23:08, July 02, 2005 CET | From | Edelweiss Party | To | Debating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty |
Message | LFP: A great way to have your pride stand in the way of a proposal you defended in the first way - no matter the way you turn it. |
Date | 19:08:52, July 02, 2005 CET | From | Edelweiss Party | To | Debating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty |
Message | Congratulations! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes | Total Seats: 53 | |||||||
no |
Total Seats: 120 | |||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 27 |
Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
Random quote: "Someone who wields power in name only can never compete with those who wield it through action." - Franz Reichert, former Luthorian politician |