Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5474
Next month in: 02:36:35
Server time: 05:23:24, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nuclear disarmament intent treaty

Details

Submitted by[?]: Edelweiss Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2075

Description[?]:

As I am allowed to be so free as to say that the LFP - founder of the conference regarding a worldwide nuclear disarmament intent treaty. As SocialGreens we would like to put pressure on the Republic of Likatonia to ask again to get this bill through!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:05:09, June 30, 2005 CET
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty
MessageOf course the LFP supports.

However, I did not intend to pass this proposal to all nations and I object to you saying I did.

That treaty forced no one to disarm except in the case that everyone else made the same promise or already had.

Date16:14:12, June 30, 2005 CET
FromEdelweiss Party
ToDebating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty
MessageI changed my description, sorry for the misunderstanding.

Date01:44:00, July 02, 2005 CET
FromProletariat Revolution Party
ToDebating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty
MessageThe title could be succinct. It's far too long. Though we support the content.

Date03:08:34, July 02, 2005 CET
FromSöhne der Freiheit
ToDebating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty
MessageThe CTP wishes to preserve the right and sovereignty of Likatonia to defend itself in any manner it deems necessary at any time.

We will not forfeit the rights of the Likatonian people to defend themselves.

Date04:19:48, July 02, 2005 CET
FromNational Centrist Party
ToDebating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty
MessageWe vote against this, for the pure reason that the Social Greens twisted our own treaty against us. That foul act of deception is an unacceptable way to promote an admirable goal.

If you wish to promote peace, do not use lies to do it.

Date10:46:28, July 02, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Party for Equality
ToDebating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty
MessageLFP: I think it was just a misunderstanding. Please don't let the good of Likatonia be compromised for your political pride. Keep some perspective.

Date11:49:40, July 02, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Party
ToDebating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty
MessageI am now thoroughly confused...
I think i'll just vote for LFP

Date18:23:08, July 02, 2005 CET
FromEdelweiss Party
ToDebating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty
MessageLFP: A great way to have your pride stand in the way of a proposal you defended in the first way - no matter the way you turn it.

Date19:08:52, July 02, 2005 CET
FromEdelweiss Party
ToDebating the Nuclear disarmament intent treaty
MessageCongratulations!

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 53

no
       

Total Seats: 120

abstain
 

Total Seats: 27


Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation.

Random quote: "Someone who wields power in name only can never compete with those who wield it through action." - Franz Reichert, former Luthorian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 75