Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5474
Next month in: 02:09:52
Server time: 01:50:07, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 2296

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2296

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

To celebrate our pre-election cooperation, I'd like to pass on the following ministries to the GWP in our new cabinet.

Environment and Tourism
Health and Social Services
Education and Culture

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:42:03, October 10, 2006 CET
FromGreen Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2296
MessageSeeing as we hold 40% of parliamentary seats, we would politely ask for the Trade and Industry Cabinet seat as well.

Date00:42:31, October 10, 2006 CET
FromGreen Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2296
MessageOther than that, we celebrate our partnership with the Social Liberals, and look to the future.

Date01:01:53, October 10, 2006 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2296
MessageDamn. I forgot about the 40%. That would amount to two more ministers.

I'll try to compensate with debates on more contentious issues between our parties.

Date01:04:29, October 10, 2006 CET
FromGreen Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2296
MessageWe will settle for one more, for Trade and Industry, which will be a 30% share of Cabinet seats, and a greater compromise on the environment and trade unionism.

Date01:11:04, October 10, 2006 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2296
MessageI just remembered that I was still able to reverse this.

*smacks forehead*

Date01:15:20, October 10, 2006 CET
FromGreen Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2296
MessageSo, are we voting this one down and entering a new proposal, or just editing this one?

Date01:22:02, October 10, 2006 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2296
MessageWe'll have to vote this one down.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
      

    Total Seats: 111

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 77


    Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

    Random quote: "The radical right is so homophobic that they're blaming global warming on the AIDS quilt." - Dennis Miller

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 48